Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34056
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | Should pregnant women know their individual risk of future pelvic floor dysfunction? A qualitative study |
Author(s): | Bugge, Carol Strachan, Heather Pringle, Stewart Hagen, Suzanne Cheyne, Helen Wilson, Don |
Keywords: | Pelvic floor dysfunction Urinary incontinence Faecal incontinence Pelvic organ prolapse Risk Maternity care |
Issue Date: | 2022 |
Date Deposited: | 10-Mar-2022 |
Citation: | Bugge C, Strachan H, Pringle S, Hagen S, Cheyne H & Wilson D (2022) Should pregnant women know their individual risk of future pelvic floor dysfunction? A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22, Art. No.: 161. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04490-9 |
Abstract: | Background The study aimed to explore: • pregnant women’s and healthcare professionals’ perspectives on provision of individual risk scores for future Pelvic Floor Dysfunction (PFD), • the feasibility of providing this during routine maternity care, • actions women might take as a result of knowing their PFD risk. Methods Qualitative study. Setting: UK NHS Health Board. Participants: Pregnant women (n = 14), obstetricians (n = 6), midwives (n = 8) and physiotherapists (n = 3). A purposive sample of pregnant women and obstetric healthcare professionals were introduced to the UR-CHOICE calculator, which estimates a woman’s PFD risk, and were shown examples of low, medium and high-risk women. Data were collected in 2019 by semi-structured interview and focus group and analysed using the Framework Approach. Results Women’s PFD knowledge was limited, meaning they were unlikely to raise PFD risk with healthcare professionals. Women believed it was important to know their individual PFD risk and that knowledge would motivate them to undertake preventative activities. Healthcare professionals believed it was important to discuss PFD risk, however limited time and concerns over increased caesarean section rates prevented this in all but high-risk women or those that expressed concerns. Conclusion Women want to know their PFD risk. As part of an intervention based within a pregnant woman/ maternity healthcare professional consultation, the UR-CHOICE calculator could support discussion to consider preventative PFD activities and to enable women to be more prepared should PFD occur. A randomised controlled trial is needed to test the effectiveness of an intervention which includes the UR-CHOICE calculator in reducing PFD. |
DOI Link: | 10.1186/s12884-022-04490-9 |
Rights: | This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
Licence URL(s): | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
s12884-022-04490-9.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 1.2 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.