Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33994
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlbalat, Amayaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGornik, Sebastianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMuangnapoh, Chonchanoken_UK
dc.contributor.authorNeil, Douglas Men_UK
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-04T01:03:34Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-04T01:03:34Z-
dc.date.issued2022-08en_UK
dc.identifier.other108930en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/33994-
dc.description.abstractIn the last decade, public interest in the welfare of decapod crustaceans has increased in many parts of the world. This has led to changes in legislation on methods for slaughter in a number of countries, while in others pressure for regulation changes is growing. Electro-stunning may have the potential for reducing noxious stimuli experienced by crustaceans during slaughter. However, data on activity in the central nervous system (CNS) and product quality-related data (indicative of consumer acceptability) are not available for most of the important decapod crustaceans, including the commercially valuable Norway lobster, Nephrops norvegicus. In this study, recordings of nerve activity showed that electro-stunning can render N. norvegicus rapidly insensible qualifying it as a potential humane slaughter procedure. In contrast, placing lobsters on ice for 30 min did not suppress neural activity. In terms of subsequent shelf life, results at day 7 based on QIM, total bacteria counts, H2S-producing bacteria, muscle pH, TMA and biogenic amines indicate no significant differences between the methods of stunning. From a quality perspective, electro-stunning did shorten the period that the product would be considered fresh (higher K-values up to day 5) and triggered faster melanosis development in the cephalothorax, an effect possibly linked to the increased temperature recorded in this area due to the imposed electrical current. However, no significant differences were detected on the cooked products by a trained sensory taste panel. While shelf life is not affected by the electro-stunning process, care should nevertheless be taken to avoid melanosis development, and the consumer perception of freshness in electro-stunned product should be studied further.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationAlbalat A, Gornik S, Muangnapoh C & Neil DM (2022) Effectiveness and quality evaluation of electrical stunning versus chilling in Norway lobsters (Nephrops norvegicus). Food Control, 138, Art. No.: 108930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.108930en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You are not required to obtain permission to reuse this article.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectlangoustineen_UK
dc.subjectslaughteren_UK
dc.subjectpost-mortemen_UK
dc.subjectwelfareen_UK
dc.titleEffectiveness and quality evaluation of electrical stunning versus chilling in Norway lobsters (Nephrops norvegicus)en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2022-03-28en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.108930en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleFood Controlen_UK
dc.citation.issn0956-7135en_UK
dc.citation.volume138en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailamaya.albalat@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date28/03/2022en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute of Aquacultureen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000820044500005en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85127340815en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1799791en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8606-2995en_UK
dc.date.accepted2022-03-01en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-03-01en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2022-03-03en_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorAlbalat, Amaya|0000-0002-8606-2995en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGornik, Sebastian|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMuangnapoh, Chonchanok|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorNeil, Douglas M|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2022-03-28en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2022-03-28en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2022-03-28|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1-s2.0-S0956713522001232-main.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0956-7135en_UK
Appears in Collections:Aquaculture Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0956713522001232-main.pdfFulltext - Published Version2.43 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.