Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33924
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFitzpatrick, Daviden_UK
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, Edward A Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Matthewen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBest, Catherineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAndreis, Federicoen_UK
dc.contributor.authorEsposito, Martinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDobbie, Richarden_UK
dc.contributor.authorCorfield, Alasdair Ren_UK
dc.contributor.authorLowe, David Jen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-04T01:02:19Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-04T01:02:19Z-
dc.date.issued2022-12en_UK
dc.identifier.other9en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/33924-
dc.description.abstractBackground COVID-19 has overwhelmed health services across the world; its global death toll has exceeded 5.3 million and continues to grow. There have been almost 15 million cases of COVID-19 in the UK. The need for rapid accurate identification, appropriate clinical care and decision making, remains a priority for UK ambulance service. To support identification and conveyance decisions of patients presenting with COVID-19 symptoms the Scottish Ambulance Service introduced the revised Medical Priority Dispatch System Protocol 36, enhanced physician led decision support and prehospital clinical guidelines. This study aimed to characterise the impact of these changes on the pathways and outcomes of people attended by the SAS) with potential COVID-19. Methods A retrospective record linkage cohort study using National Data collected from NHS Scotland over a 5 month period (April–August 2020). Results The SAS responded to 214,082 emergency calls during the study time period. The positive predictive value of the Protocol 36 to identify potentially COVID-19 positive patients was low (17%). Approximately 60% of those identified by Protocol 36 as potentially COVID-19 positive were conveyed. The relationship between conveyance and mortality differed between Protocol 36 Covid-19 positive calls and those that were not. In those identified by Protocol 36 as Covid-19 negative, 30 day mortality was higher in those not conveyed (not conveyed 9.2%; conveyed 6.6%) but in the Protocol 36 Covid-19 positive calls, mortality was higher in those conveyed (not conveyed 4.3% conveyed 8.8%). Thirty-day mortality rates of those with COVID-19 diagnosed through virology was between 28.8 and 30.2%. Conclusion The low positive predictive value (17%) of Protocol 36 in identifying potential COVID-19 in patients emphasises the importance of ambulance clinicians approaching each call as involving COVID-19, reinforcing the importance of adhering to existing policy and continued use of PPE at all calls. The non-conveyance rate of people that were categorised as COVID-19 negative was higher than in the preceding year in the same service. The reasons for the higher rates of non-conveyance and the relationship between non conveyance rates and death at 3 and 30 days post index call are unknown and would benefit from further study.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_UK
dc.relationFitzpatrick D, Duncan EAS, Moore M, Best C, Andreis F, Esposito M, Dobbie R, Corfield AR & Lowe DJ (2022) Epidemiology of emergency ambulance service calls related to COVID-19 in Scotland: a national record linkage study. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 30 (1), Art. No.: 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-00995-6en_UK
dc.rightsThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicineen_UK
dc.subjectEmergency Medicineen_UK
dc.titleEpidemiology of emergency ambulance service calls related to COVID-19 in Scotland: a national record linkage studyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13049-022-00995-6en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid35090527en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicineen_UK
dc.citation.issn1757-7241en_UK
dc.citation.volume30en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderChief Scientist Officeen_UK
dc.author.emailcatherine.best2@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date28/01/2022en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationScottish Ambulance Serviceen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSociology, Social Policy & Criminologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Stirlingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNESTAen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationScottish Ambulance Serviceen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPublic Health Scotlanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRoyal Alexandra Hospital (NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Greater Glasgow & Clydeen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000748246300001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85123876073en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1791938en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0653-8445en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3400-905Xen_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9957-608Xen_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3652-2498en_UK
dc.date.accepted2022-01-06en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-01-06en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2022-02-03en_UK
dc.subject.tagCOVID-19en_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorFitzpatrick, David|0000-0003-0653-8445en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDuncan, Edward A S|0000-0002-3400-905Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMoore, Matthew|0000-0002-9957-608Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBest, Catherine|0000-0002-3652-2498en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAndreis, Federico|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorEsposito, Martin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDobbie, Richard|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCorfield, Alasdair R|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLowe, David J|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Chief Scientist Office|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000589en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2022-02-03en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2022-02-03|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenames13049-022-00995-6.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1757-7241en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s13049-022-00995-6.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.22 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.