|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Doping, European Law and the Implications of Meca-Medina|
|Publisher:||Taylor & Francis (Routledge)|
|Citation:||Callery C & McArdle D (2011) Doping, European Law and the Implications of Meca- Medina, International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 3 (2), pp. 163-175.|
|Abstract:||The ruling of the European Court of Justice in the anti-doping case of Meca Medina v. The Commission has important implications for athletes, domestic governing bodies, international federations and supra-national actors such as WADA and the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Meca-Medina has been criticised as an unwelcome interference by the courts in the legitimate activities of sporting organisations, but after Bosman it was fanciful to argue that those organisations should be ‘above the law’ and the courts should have no jurisdiction over their activities. That said, there is a stark difference between the courts having jurisdiction over sports’ decisions and being willing to overturn them - the courts have been, and remain, willing to defer to the expertise of sporting organisations. However, the ECJ’s ruling in MOTOE confirms that the courts will intervene in appropriate circumstances. In order to avoid sanction on competition law grounds sports organisations must thus be able to justify their provisions on (for example) what is an unacceptable level of nandrolone, show that athletes’ fundamental rights such as the right to a fair hearing have been respected, and ensure that any sanctions imposed upon athletes who fall foul of doping regulations are proportionate to the offence|
|Rights:||Published in International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics by Taylor & Francis (Routledge).; This is an electronic version of an article published in International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp. 163 - 175. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics is available online at: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&issn=1940-6940&volume=3&issue=2&spage=163|
|Affiliation:||University of Edinburgh|
|Doping, European Law and the Implications of Meca-Medina.pdf||100.82 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|Callery McArdle.doc||154.5 kB||Microsoft Word||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.