Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32596
Appears in Collections: | Economics Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | How hungry were the poor in late 1930s Britain? |
Author(s): | Gazeley, Ian Newell, Andrew Reynolds, Kevin Rufrancos, Hector |
Contact Email: | hector.rufrancos@stir.ac.uk |
Keywords: | Economics and Econometrics History |
Issue Date: | Feb-2022 |
Date Deposited: | 10-May-2021 |
Citation: | Gazeley I, Newell A, Reynolds K & Rufrancos H (2022) How hungry were the poor in late 1930s Britain?. The Economic History Review, 75 (1), pp. 80-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.13079 |
Abstract: | This article re‐examines energy and nutrition available to British working‐class households in the late 1930s using individual household expenditure and consumption data. We use these data to address a number of questions. First, what was the extent of malnutrition in late 1930s Britain? Second, how did the incidence change over time? Third, what were the nutritional consequences of the school meals and school milk schemes? We conclude that, for working households, energy and nutritional availability improved significantly compared with current estimates of availability before the First World War. These improvements were not equally shared, however. In the late 1930s, homes with an unemployed head of household had diets that provided around 20 per cent less energy than their working counterparts and female‐headed households had diets that provided around 10 per cent fewer kcal per capita than the average male‐headed household. The availability of most macro‐ and micronutrients showed similar relative reductions. State interventions designed to improve diet and nutrition, such as school meals and school milk, made children's diets significantly healthier, even if they did not eliminate macro‐ and micronutrient deficiencies completely. Not surprisingly, they made the greatest difference to children in households where the head of household was unemployed. |
DOI Link: | 10.1111/ehr.13079 |
Rights: | © 2021 The Authors. The Economic History Review published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Economic History Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Licence URL(s): | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gazeley-etal-EHR-2022.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 377.7 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.