Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31843
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: How not to Define Punishment
Author(s): Duff, R A
Issue Date: 2015
Date Deposited: 20-Oct-2020
Citation: Duff RA (2015) How not to Define Punishment. Philosophy and Public Issues, 5 (1), pp. 25-41. http://fqp.luiss.it/category/numero/2015-5-1/
Abstract: First paragraph: Brooks offers a critical survey of different normative theories of punishment, finding serious problems with them all, and argues that we should adopt ‘the unified theory of punishment’ that he draws from Hegel and the English Idealists. I had intended to focus this paper on ‘the unified theory’, to ask whether it is indeed both genuinely unified and plausible; but I was so taken aback by what Brooks says about the definition of punishment in the early pages of the Introduction that I have focused instead on that. It might seem misguided to devote so much attention to these first few pages: but if one is going to engage in definitional discussion, it is important to get it right.
URL: http://fqp.luiss.it/category/numero/2015-5-1/
Rights: PPI is an Open Access Journal. All users can read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link the full texts of articles.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2_Duff_How-not-to-Define-Punishment_PPI_vol5_n1_2015.pdfFulltext - Published Version849.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.