Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31088
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcLean, Sarah Pen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHabeeb, Christine Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorCoffee, Peteen_UK
dc.contributor.authorEklund, Robert Cen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-02T00:12:06Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-02T00:12:06Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/31088-
dc.description.abstractEfficacy beliefs and communication are key constructs which have been targeted to develop task cohesion. This study’s purpose was to: (1) examine whether collective efficacy, team-focused other-efficacy, and team-focused relation-inferred self-efficacy (RISE) are predictive of task cohesion, and (2) evaluate the possibility that communication mediates efficacy-task cohesion relationships. British university team-sport athletes (n = 250) completed questionnaires assessing efficacy beliefs, communication (i.e., positive conflict, negative conflict, and acceptance communication), and task cohesion (i.e., attractions to group; ATG-T, group integration; GI-T). Data were subjected to a multi-group path analysis to test mediation hypotheses while also addressing potential differences across males and females. Across all athletes, collective efficacy and team-focused other-efficacy significantly predicted ATG-T and GI-T directly. Positive conflict and acceptance communication significantly mediated relationships between efficacy (team-focused other-efficacy, collective efficacy) and cohesion (ATG-T, GI-T). Findings suggest enhancing athletes’ collective efficacy and team-focused efficacy beliefs will encourage communication factors affecting task cohesion.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherHuman Kineticsen_UK
dc.relationMcLean SP, Habeeb CM, Coffee P & Eklund RC (2020) Efficacy Beliefs are Related to Task Cohesion: Communication is a Mediator. Sport Psychologist, 34 (3), p. 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2019-0056en_UK
dc.rightsAccepted author manuscript version reprinted, by permission, from The Sport Psychologist, 2020, 34 (3), p. 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2019-0056. © Human Kinetics, Inc.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdfen_UK
dc.subjecttask cohesionen_UK
dc.subjectcollective efficacyen_UK
dc.subjectother-efficacyen_UK
dc.subjectrelation-inferred self-efficacyen_UK
dc.subjectcommunicationen_UK
dc.titleEfficacy Beliefs are Related to Task Cohesion: Communication is a Mediatoren_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1123/tsp.2019-0056en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleSport Psychologisten_UK
dc.citation.issn1543-2793en_UK
dc.citation.issn0888-4781en_UK
dc.citation.volume34en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.spage187en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEast Carolina University, USAen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSporten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFlorida State Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000569173600003en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85091531691en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1610193en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1055-0052en_UK
dc.date.accepted2020-04-28en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-04-28en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-05-01en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcLean, Sarah P|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHabeeb, Christine M|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCoffee, Pete|0000-0002-1055-0052en_UK
local.rioxx.authorEklund, Robert C|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2020-05-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdf|2020-05-01|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameMcLean et al. (2020).pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1543-2793en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
McLean et al. (2020).pdfFulltext - Accepted Version723.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.