Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31027
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorWalsh, Michael-
dc.contributor.advisorKittler, Markus-
dc.contributor.authorFaeth, Pia Charlotte-
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-22T09:05:19Z-
dc.date.issued2019-12-20-
dc.identifier.citationFaeth and Kittler (2017). How do you fear? Examining expatriates’ perception of danger and its consequences. Journal of Global Mobility: The Home of Expatriate Management Research, 5 (4), 391-417.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/31027-
dc.description.abstractRecent international political and economic developments have led to an increased number of expatriates being assigned to environments characterised as hostile. While expatriation itself already has a long-standing reputation of being a stressful event, the still very limited literature on expatriation in hostile environments (HEs) shows consensus that assignments in hostile regions pose additional stressors that go beyond the need to adjust to a new culture, leading to increased stress for the individual. Increased stress is a phenomenon that is often associated with severe health outcomes such as burnout – a topic that is also relatively new on the expatriate research agenda. This thesis discusses whether expatriates working in hostile, arguably highly stressful, environments are particularly at risk for the development of burnout. It further aims to identify context-relevant factors potentially responsible for the development of burnout and conversely work engagement as its conceptual opposite. Insights are based on a systematic literature review and two empirical studies applying the Job Demands-Resource (JD-R) model (Demerouti et al., 2001) to expatriation in HEs. In-depth interviews with 42 expatriates assigned to HEs, revealed a set of general and HE-specific job and personal demands and resources that form the basis of a context-specific application of the JD-R model for HEs. The proposed model was tested in the subsequent quantitative study, drawing on survey data from 178 expatriates assigned to HEs. Findings imply that particularly high workload, work-life conflicts, cultural novelty, perceived organisational support, job satisfaction and support networks are critical predictors of work related outcomes. Results also suggest that the fear of crime or victimisation seems to be absent, and that expatriates are challenged by and seek support from similar sources as their counterparts in low-risk countries. The studies contribute to the young debate on hostile environments and global mobility, as well as disclosing interesting avenues for future research. This thesis also offers valuable insights for international HR-practitioners discussing HE assignment policies and practices, as well as stress management interventions.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Stirlingen_GB
dc.subjecthostile environmentsen_GB
dc.subjectexpatriatesen_GB
dc.subjectJD-Ren_GB
dc.subjectburnouten_GB
dc.subjectwork engagementen_GB
dc.subject.lcshExpatriationen_GB
dc.subject.lcshEmigration and immigrationen_GB
dc.subject.lcshEmployment in foreign countriesen_GB
dc.subject.lcshWork environmenten_GB
dc.subject.lcshJob stressen_GB
dc.titleWorking in dangerous contexts: Advancing the conceptual and empirical approach to work in hostile environmentsen_GB
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctor of Philosophyen_GB
dc.rights.embargodate2022-06-30-
dc.rights.embargoreasonPlanning to publish parts of the thesis.At the request of the author the thesis has been embargoed for a number of months with an authorised exception to the UKRI required 12 month maximum. UKRI have agreed that, at the discretion of the University, authors can request short extensions beyond the prescribed 12 months.en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonAt the request of the author the thesis has been embargoed for a number of months with an authorised exception to the UKRI required 12 month maximum. UKRI have agreed that, at the discretion of the University, authors can request short extensions beyond the prescribed 12 months.en_GB
dc.contributor.funderEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
dc.author.emailpia.faeth@yahoo.deen_GB
dc.rights.embargoterms2022-07-01en_GB
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2022-07-01-
Appears in Collections:Management, Work and Organisation eTheses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PhDThesisPiaFaeth (final version).pdf3.41 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.