|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Evidence, policy and guidance for practice: a critical reflection on the case of social housing landlords and antisocial behaviour in Scotland|
|Citation:||Anderson I (2011) Evidence, policy and guidance for practice: a critical reflection on the case of social housing landlords and antisocial behaviour in Scotland, Evidence and Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 7 (1), pp. 41-58.|
|Abstract:||This article examines the role of guidance for practitioners in the evidence-policy-practice relationship through a critical reflection of the process of developing evidence-informed guidance for housing practitioners working in the area of antisocial behaviour in Scotland. The paper applies theoretical models for the use of evidence in policy and practice to the process of designing guidance; to assessing its impact; and to the potential for practice to (re-)influence the policy process. The analysis identifies challenges and lessons in terms of: the blurring of professional boundaries; scope for increased rigour in practice guidance; the need for mechanisms to monitor the impact of guidance; and the need to incorporate the influence of practice more explicitly in analysis of the policy process. Adopting a more dynamic, systems approach to using evidence could enhance the effectiveness of the process.|
|Rights:||The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author; you can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.; The Policy Press has an Open Access and self-archiving policy, which currently allows the final submitted version to be posted in institutional repositories 12 months following the publication of the article in our journal. We also allow pre-prints (ie, pre-peer review) to be posted at any time in a repository with a link to the final published version. The full policy can be found here http://www.policypress.co.uk/info_archiving.asp? but may be subject to review so do contact us if you have any queries in the future.|
|Notes:||This article is available online via Ingenta and may be accessed from the following URL : http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/tpp/ep/2011/00000007/00000001/art00004|
|anderson-evidence.pdf||167.17 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 31/12/2999 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependant on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.