Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29461
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Disproportionality in NHS disciplinary proceedings
Author(s): Archibong, Uduak
Kline, Roger
Eshareturi, Cyril
McIntosh, Bryan
Contact Email: bryan.mcintosh@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Black minority ethnic
Disrupting disproportionality
Inclusive workplace
Issue Date: Apr-2019
Date Deposited: 9-May-2019
Citation: Archibong U, Kline R, Eshareturi C & McIntosh B (2019) Disproportionality in NHS disciplinary proceedings. British Journal of Health Care Management, 25 (4). https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2018.0062
Abstract: Background/Aims This article investigates the representation of black, Asian and minority ethnic staff in NHS disciplinary proceedings. Methods The study involved an in-depth knowledge review and analysis of literature on the representation of black, Asian and minority ethnic staff in NHS disciplinary proceedings from 2008 to 2017, as well as semi-structured interviews with 15 key stakeholders. Participants were stakeholders from both primary and secondary care and included equality and diversity leads, human resource professionals, NHS service managers, representatives of trade unions and health professional regulatory council representatives. Findings The knowledge review indicates that to date, black, Asian and minority ethnic staff are disproportionately represented in NHS disciplinary proceedings. Evidence gathered demonstrates the continuation of inappropriate individual disciplinary action and failure to address organisational shortcomings against black, Asian and minority ethnic members of staff. Conclusions Overall, six factors were identified as underpinning the disproportionate representation of black minority ethnic staff in disciplinaries: closed culture and climate; subjective attitudes and behaviour; inconclusive disciplinary data; unfair decision making; poor disciplinary support; and disciplinary policy misapplication.
DOI Link: 10.12968/bjhc.2018.0062
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This document is the Accepted Manuscript version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in British Journal of Health Care Management, copyright © MA Healthcare, after peer review and technical editing by the publisher. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2018.0062
Licence URL(s): https://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdf

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
bjhc.2018.0063_R1.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version580.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.