Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29267
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Feasibility and outcomes of Fibreoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing following prophylactic swallowing rehabilitation in head and neck cancer
Author(s): Patterson, Joanne M
Toft, Katherine
McAuley, Fiona
King, Emma
McLachlan, Kirsty
Roe, Justin W G
Wells, Mary
Contact Email: emma.king@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Head and neck cancer
radiotherapy
dysphagia
rehabilitation
intervention
Fibreoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing
feasibility
Issue Date: Jul-2019
Date Deposited: 9-Apr-2019
Citation: Patterson JM, Toft K, McAuley F, King E, McLachlan K, Roe JWG & Wells M (2019) Feasibility and outcomes of Fibreoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing following prophylactic swallowing rehabilitation in head and neck cancer. Clinical Otolaryngology, 44 (4), pp. 549-556. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13331
Abstract: Objectives Investigate the feasibility and outcomes of fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) following a programme of prophylactic swallowing exercises in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with radiotherapy. Design Prospective, single cohort, feasibility study. Setting Three head and neck cancer centres in Scotland. Participants Pre‐radiotherapy HNC patients who consented to participate in a prophylactic swallowing intervention. Outcome measures FEES recruitment and retention rates, assessment acceptability and compliance, qualitative process evaluation. Results Higher rates of recruitment and retention were achieved in centres where FEES equipment was available on site. Travel and anticipated discomfort were barriers to recruitment. Data completion was high for all rating scales, with goo d reliability. Following radiotherapy, swallowing safety significantly deteriorated for liquid boluses (p=0.005‐0.03); pharyngeal residue increased for liquid and semi‐solid boluses. Pharyngo‐laryngeal oedema was present pre‐treatment and significantly increased post‐radiotherapy (p=0.001). Patients generally reported positive experience of FEES for their own learning and establishing a baseline. Conclusions FEES is an acceptable method of assessing patients for a prophylactic swallowing intervention and offers some additional information missing from VF. Barriers have been identified and should be taken into account in order to maximise recruitment for future trials.
DOI Link: 10.1111/coa.13331
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Patterson, JM, Toft, K, McAuley, F, et al. Feasibility and outcomes of fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing following prophylactic swallowing rehabilitation in head and neck cancer. Clin Otolaryngol. 2019; 44: 549– 556, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13331. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Patterson_et_al-2019-Clinical_Otolaryngology.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version1.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.