Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28928
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Martinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKuusisto, Jarien_UK
dc.contributor.authorGrant, Kevinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDe Silva, Muthuen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFlowers, Stephenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorChoksy, Umairen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-07T01:03:48Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-07T01:03:48Z-
dc.date.issued2019-09en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/28928-
dc.description.abstractThis contribution explores new organisational forms facilitating Triple Helix relations. Analysts have pointed to the blurring of institutional boundaries and the emergence of hybrid organisations at the interface between university, industry and government. Starting out from the notion that Triple Helix organisations develop and maintain knowledge, consensus and innovation spaces, we explore four cases of competence centres that operate in this context. Comparing them, we identify Finnish SHOK centres as the most radical departure from more traditional forms of university–industry collaboration. These can be characterised as independent legal entities that are involved in integrating a large, possibly cluster-level or technology-focused network, defining the agenda for specific specialisation areas by engaging in all or most of the Triple Helix spaces. We argue they could be better positioned than existing intermediary organisations to deliver the Triple Helix concept. © 2018 RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltden_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWileyen_UK
dc.relationMeyer M, Kuusisto J, Grant K, De Silva M, Flowers S & Choksy U (2019) Towards new Triple Helix organisations? A comparative study of competence centres as knowledge, consensus and innovation spaces. R and D Management, 49 (4), pp. 555-573. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12342en_UK
dc.rights[RD MAN 24072018 preprint.pdf] This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Meyer, M., Kuusisto, J., Grant, K., De Silva, M., Flowers, S. and Choksy, U. (2019), Towards new Triple Helix organisations? A comparative study of competence centres as knowledge, consensus and innovation spaces. R&D Management, 49: 555-573, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12342. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.en_UK
dc.rights[Meyer_et_al-2019-R_D_Management.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdfen_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.titleTowards new Triple Helix organisations? A comparative study of competence centres as knowledge, consensus and innovation spacesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Meyer_et_al-2019-R_D_Management.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/radm.12342en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleR&D Managementen_UK
dc.citation.issn1467-9310en_UK
dc.citation.issn0033-6807en_UK
dc.citation.volume49en_UK
dc.citation.issue4en_UK
dc.citation.spage555en_UK
dc.citation.epage573en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.author.emailkevin.grant@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date17/10/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Kenten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Vaasaen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBirkbeck University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Kenten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Kenten_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000479060300009en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85055026703en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1231244en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-10-17en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-10-17en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-02-21en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMeyer, Martin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKuusisto, Jari|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGrant, Kevin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDe Silva, Muthu|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFlowers, Stephen|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorChoksy, Umair|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|University of Dundee|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008890en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2268-09-18en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameMeyer_et_al-2019-R_D_Management.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount2en_UK
local.rioxx.source1467-9310en_UK
Appears in Collections:Management, Work and Organisation Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RD MAN 24072018 preprint.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version403.15 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Meyer_et_al-2019-R_D_Management.pdfFulltext - Published Version181.42 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.