Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28255
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMayne, Ruthen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Duncanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGuijt, Ireneen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWalsh, Martinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorEnglish, Richarden_UK
dc.contributor.authorCairney, Paulen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-21T01:01:12Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-21T01:01:12Z-
dc.date.issued2018-12-31en_UK
dc.identifier.other122en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/28255-
dc.description.abstractPolicymaking is rarely 'evidence-based'. Rather, policy can only be strongly evidence-informed if its advocates act effectively. Policy theories suggest that they can do so by learning the rules of political systems, and by forming relationships and networks with key actors to build up enough knowledge of their environment and trust from their audience. This knowledge allows them to craft effective influencing strategies, such as to tell a persuasive and timely story about an urgent policy problem and its most feasible solution. Empirical case studies help explain when, how, and why such strategies work in context. If analysed carefully, they can provide transferable lessons for researchers and advocates that are seeking to inform or influence policymaking. Oxfam Great Britain has become an experienced and effective advocate of evidence-informed policy change, offering lessons for building effective action. In this article, we combine insights from policy studies with specific case studies of Oxfam campaigns to describe four ways to promote the uptake of research evidence in policy: (1) learn how policymaking works, (2) design evidence to maximise its influence on specific audiences, (3) design and use additional influencing strategies such as insider persuasion or outsider pressure, and adapt the presentation of evidence and influencing strategies to the changing context, and (4) embrace trial and error. The supply of evidence is one important but insufficient part of this story.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSpringer Nature America, Incen_UK
dc.relationMayne R, Green D, Guijt I, Walsh M, English R & Cairney P (2018) Using evidence to influence policy: Oxfam's experience. Palgrave Communications, 4 (1), Art. No.: 122. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0176-7en_UK
dc.rightsThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.titleUsing evidence to influence policy: Oxfam's experienceen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1057/s41599-018-0176-7en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePalgrave Communicationsen_UK
dc.citation.issn2055-1045en_UK
dc.citation.volume4en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.citation.date09/10/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationOxfam GBen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationOxfam GBen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationOxfam GBen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationOxfam GBen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationOxfam GBen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPoliticsen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000447423600002en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85065042314en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1057707en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9956-832Xen_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-09-17en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-09-17en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-11-20en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMayne, Ruth|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGreen, Duncan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGuijt, Irene|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWalsh, Martin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorEnglish, Richard|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCairney, Paul|0000-0002-9956-832Xen_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2018-11-20en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2018-11-20|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameMayneUsingEvidenceToInfluencePolicy.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2055-1045en_UK
Appears in Collections:History and Politics Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MayneUsingEvidenceToInfluencePolicy.pdfFulltext - Published Version459.15 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.