Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27854
Appears in Collections: | Computing Science and Mathematics Conference Papers and Proceedings |
Author(s): | Beck, Tilman Böschen, Falk Scherp, Ansgar |
Title: | What to Read Next? Challenges and Preliminary Results in Selecting Representative Documents |
Editor(s): | Elloumi, M Granitzer, M Hameurlain, A Seifert, C Stein, B Tjoa, AM Wagner, R |
Citation: | Beck T, Böschen F & Scherp A (2018) What to Read Next? Challenges and Preliminary Results in Selecting Representative Documents. In: Elloumi M, Granitzer M, Hameurlain A, Seifert C, Stein B, Tjoa A & Wagner R (eds.) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 903. 29th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, DEXA 2018, Regensburg, Germany, 03.09.2018-06.09.2018. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 230-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99133-7_19 |
Issue Date: | 31-Dec-2018 |
Date Deposited: | 27-Sep-2018 |
Series/Report no.: | Communications in Computer and Information Science, 903 |
Conference Name: | 29th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, DEXA 2018 |
Conference Dates: | 2018-09-03 - 2018-09-06 |
Conference Location: | Regensburg, Germany |
Abstract: | The vast amount of scientific literature poses a challenge when one is trying to understand a previously unknown topic. Selecting a representative subset of documents that covers most of the desired content can solve this challenge by presenting the user a small subset of documents. We build on existing research on representative subset extraction and apply it in an information retrieval setting. Our document selection process consists of three steps: computation of the document representations, clustering, and selection of documents. We implement and compare two different document representations, two different clustering algorithms, and three different selection methods using a coverage and a redundancy metric. We execute our 36 experiments on two datasets, with 10 sample queries each, from different domains. The results show that there is no clear favorite and that we need to ask the question whether coverage and redundancy are sufficient for evaluating representative subsets. |
Status: | AM - Accepted Manuscript |
Rights: | This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of a paper published in Elloumi M. et al. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 903. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99133-7_19 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
W43-BeckEtAl-Challenges and Preliminary Results in Selecting Representative Documents.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 725.74 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.