Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27632
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Difference between Recommended Retail Price and Sales Price for tobacco products in independent and convenience (small) retailers before and after the introduction of standardised tobacco packaging in the UK
Other Titles: Standardised packaging and RRP
Author(s): Critchlow, Nathan
Stead, Martine
Moodie, Crawford
Angus, Kathryn
Eadie, Douglas
MacKintosh, Anne Marie
Contact Email: c.s.moodie@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Advertising and Promotion
Packaging and Labelling
Price
Public policy
Issue Date: Jun-2019
Date Deposited: 16-Aug-2018
Citation: Critchlow N, Stead M, Moodie C, Angus K, Eadie D & MacKintosh AM (2019) Difference between Recommended Retail Price and Sales Price for tobacco products in independent and convenience (small) retailers before and after the introduction of standardised tobacco packaging in the UK [Standardised packaging and RRP]. Tobacco Control, 28 (4), pp. 449-456. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054409
Abstract: Aim: Recommended Retail Price (RRP) is a marketing strategy used by tobacco companies to maintain competitiveness, communicate product positioning, and drive sales. We explored small retailer adherence to RRP before and after the introduction of the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations in the United Kingdom (fully implemented 20th May 2017), which mandated standardised packaging of cigarettes and rolling tobacco, set minimum pack/pouch sizes, and prohibited price-marking. Method: Monthly Electronic Point of Sale data from 500 small retailers in England, Scotland, and Wales were analysed. From May 2016-October 2017, we monitored 20 of the best-selling fully-branded tobacco products (15 factory-made cigarettes, 5 rolling tobacco) and their standardised equivalents. Adherence to RRP was measured as the average difference (%) between monthly RRPs and Sale Prices by pack type (fully-branded vs. standardised), price-marking on packaging, and price segment. Results: The average difference between RRP and Sales Price increased from +0.36% above RRP (SD=0.72) in May 2016, when only fully-branded packs were sold, to +1.37% in October 2017 (SD=0.30), when standardised packs were mandatory. Increases above RRP for fully-branded packs increased as they were phased out, with deviation greater for non-price-marked packs and premium products. Discussion: Despite tobacco companies emphasising the importance of RRP, small retailers implemented small increases above RRP as standardised packaging was introduced. Consequently, any intended price changes by tobacco companies in response to the legislation (i.e. to increase affordability or brand positioning) may be confounded by retailer behaviour, and such deviation may increase consumer price sensitivity.
DOI Link: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054409
Rights: This article has been accepted for publication in Tobacco Control following peer review, and the Version of Record can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054409

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Adherence to Recommended Retail Price (1).pdfFulltext - Accepted Version362.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.