Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/2726
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCameron, Joanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRoxburgh, Michelleen_UK
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Julieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLauder, Williamen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-27T03:35:03Z-
dc.date.available2018-01-27T03:35:03Z-
dc.date.issued2011-04en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/2726-
dc.description.abstractAbstract Aims and objectives. The purpose of this integrative review of the literature was to find and review research studies which explored student attrition to determine what is known about the topic and to identify gaps in the research. Background. Attrition from nursing and midwifery programmes is a serious international problem. It is recognised as being a complex phenomenon, not attributable to a single cause, but to multiple reasons. Regardless of actual attrition rates and trends, departments of nursing and midwifery are challenged to perform in a businesslike manner. Consequently every student lost to a programme of study equates to a financial penalty for the department and to the future workforce and community. Design. Integrative review of the literature. Method. Using electronic databases and specific search terms 21 articles were identified and reviewed. Findings from the identified research literature were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results. Four broad themes that accounted for factors of relevance to attrition were identified: Social; Prediction; Programme and Personal. Conclusions. Methodological problems abound in studies into retention. These include incomplete or inaccurate data and low response rates. Attrition early in programmes can be attributed to a failure to understand the roles of nurses and midwives in contemporary societies. This has led to dissatisfaction with programmes and academic failure, as students may underestimate the intellectual demands of their programmes. Attrition later in the programme is attributed to a combination of personal factors that culminate in a personal crisis. Relevance to clinical practice. The research literature suggests that stereotyping of nurses is a major factor in attrition. Both professions need to find ways of communicating contemporary roles to wider societyen_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_UK
dc.relationCameron J, Roxburgh M, Taylor J & Lauder W (2011) Why students leave in the UK: an integrative review of the international research literature. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20 (7-8), pp. 1086-1096. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03328.xen_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author; you can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjecteducation programmeen_UK
dc.subjectnursingen_UK
dc.subjectstudenten_UK
dc.subjectreviewen_UK
dc.subjectNursing Study and teaching Great Britainen_UK
dc.subjectMidwifery Study and teaching Great Britainen_UK
dc.subjectCollege dropouts Great Britain Preventionen_UK
dc.subjectMotivation in adult educationen_UK
dc.titleWhy students leave in the UK: an integrative review of the international research literatureen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-30en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[WHYSLPAPER.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03328.xen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Clinical Nursingen_UK
dc.citation.issn1365-2702en_UK
dc.citation.issn0962-1067en_UK
dc.citation.volume20en_UK
dc.citation.issue7-8en_UK
dc.citation.spage1086en_UK
dc.citation.epage1096en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailmichelle.roxburgh@uhi.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date29/09/2010en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Post Qual - Stirling - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Research - Stirling - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Research - Stirling - LEGACYen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000288166500020en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-79952513015en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid815901en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2010-09-29en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2011-02-18en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorCameron, Joan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoxburgh, Michelle|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTaylor, Julie|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLauder, William|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-30en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameWHYSLPAPER.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0962-1067en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WHYSLPAPER.pdfFulltext - Published Version101.47 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-30    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.