Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26538
Appears in Collections:Literature and Languages Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: DIY Peer Review and Monograph Publishing in the Arts and Humanities (Forthcoming)
Authors: Butchard, Dorothy
Rowberry, Simon
Squires, Claire
Contact Email: claire.squires@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Peer review
scholarly publishing
monographs
co-authorship
Citation: Butchard D, Rowberry S & Squires C (2017) DIY Peer Review and Monograph Publishing in the Arts and Humanities (Forthcoming), Convergence.
Abstract: In order to explore monograph peer review in the Arts and Humanities, this article introduces and discusses an applied example, examining the route to publication of Danielle Fuller and DeNel Rehberg Sedo’s Reading Beyond the Book: The Social Practices of Contemporary Literary Culture (2013). The book’s co-authors supplemented the traditional “blind” peer review system with a range of practices including the informal, DIY review of colleagues and “clever friends,” as well as using the feedback derived from grant applications, journal articles, and book chapters. The article “explodes” the book into a series of documents and non-linear processes to demonstrate the significance of the various forms of feedback to the development of Fuller and Rehberg Sedo’s monograph. The analysis reveals substantial differences between book and article peer review processes, including an emphasis on marketing in review forms and the pressures to publish, that the co-authors navigated through the introduction of “clever friends” to the review processes. These findings, drawing on Science and Technology Studies (STS), demonstrate how such a research methodology can identify how knowledge is constructed in the Arts and Humanities, and potential implications for the valuation of research processes and collaborations.
Rights: Squires C, Rowberry S & Butchard D, DIY Peer Review and Monograph Publishing in the Arts and Humanities, Convergence (Forthcoming). Copyright © Authors 2018. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
DIY Peer Review and Monograph Publishing_acceptedversion.pdf330.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Figure 1.png16.86 kBimage/pngThumbnail
View/Open
Figure 2.png65.42 kBimage/pngThumbnail
View/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.