Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status: ||Refereed|
|Title: ||The Welfare Test: Determining the Indeterminate|
|Authors: ||Sutherland, Elaine E|
|Contact Email: ||email@example.com|
|Issue Date: ||Jan-2018|
|Citation: ||Sutherland EE (2018) The Welfare Test: Determining the Indeterminate, Edinburgh Law Review, 22 (1), pp. 94-100.|
|Abstract: ||First paragraph: Many parting or never-together parents reach agreement on the future arrangements for the care of their child, sometimes with the help of a third party, like a mediator. When they cannot agree, disputes may be particularly acrimonious and intractable, with NJDB v JEG providing a graphic illustration of disputes of this kind at their worst. How the law frames the criteria for decision-making in disputed cases is important, not only for those who litigate, but also by providing context for those “bargaining in the shadow of the law”|
|DOI Link: ||http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/elr.2018.0457|
|Rights: ||This is an Author’s Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Edinburgh University Press in Edinburgh Law Review, Volume 22 Issue 1, Page 94-100. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2018.0457|
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.