Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26466
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | How tobacco companies in the United Kingdom prepared for, and responded to, standardised packaging of cigarettes and rolling tobacco |
Author(s): | Moodie, Crawford Angus, Kathryn Mitchell, Danielle Critchlow, Nathan |
Contact Email: | c.s.moodie@stir.ac.uk |
Keywords: | Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health Health(social science) |
Issue Date: | 31-Jul-2018 |
Date Deposited: | 5-Jan-2018 |
Citation: | Moodie C, Angus K, Mitchell D & Critchlow N (2018) How tobacco companies in the United Kingdom prepared for, and responded to, standardised packaging of cigarettes and rolling tobacco. Tobacco Control, 27 (e1), pp. e85-e92. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054011 |
Abstract: | Introduction As a result of the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations and Tobacco Products Directive, all packs of cigarettes (factory-made and hand-rolled) in the United Kingdom must be drab brown, display pictorial warnings on the principal display areas, and contain no less than 20 cigarettes or 30 grams of tobacco. The legislation was phased in between May 2016 and May 2017. Our objective was to monitor pack, brand and product changes pre- and post-implementation. Methods Our surveillance of the cigarette market involved a review of the trade press, a monthly monitor of online supermarkets, and regular visits to stores, from May 2015 to June 2017. Results Pre-standardised packaging there were changes to the pack graphics (e.g. redesigned packs and limited-editions) and pack structure (e.g. re-sealable inner foil), and the issue of a number of re-usable tins. Post-standardised packaging, changes included newer cigarette pack sizes for some brand variants (e.g. 23 and 24 packs). Changes to the branding pre-standardised packaging included brand extensions, and post-standardised packaging included brand and/or variant name change, often with the inclusion of colour descriptors, and brand migrations. Product changes pre-standardised packaging included the introduction of novel filters (e.g. filters with two flavour-changing capsules, tube filters, firmer filters, and filters with granular additives). There was non-compliance with the legislation, with slim packs, which are not permitted, on sale after standardised packaging was implemented. Conclusions Our findings highlight the need to monitor developments in markets introducing standardised packaging, and have policy implications for countries considering this measure. |
DOI Link: | 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054011 |
Rights: | This article has been accepted for publication in Tobacco Control following peer review. The definitive copyedited, typeset version, Moodie C, Angus K, Mitchell D, et al, How tobacco companies in the UK prepared for and responded to standardised packaging of cigarettes and rolling tobacco, Tobacco Control, Published Online First: 10 January 2018, is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054011 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
TC response to PP in UK.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 473.54 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.