Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26360
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFaeth, Pia Charlotteen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKittler, Markusen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-23T23:35:40Z-
dc.date.available2017-12-23T23:35:40Z-
dc.date.issued2017en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/26360-
dc.description.abstractPurpose  The purpose of this paper is to investigate the differing perceptions of fear of expatriates operating in terror-exposed Nairobi and the high-crime environment of Johannesburg and its impact on stress and well-being. It illustrates how expatriates cope with the challenges associated with these two regions.   Design/methodology/approach  Following an interpretative and inductive research approach, qualitative content analyses were conducted using evidence from in-depth interviews with 12 expatriates in senior management or officer positions within a large global organisation, with respondents based in South Africa and Kenya.  Findings  Data suggest that expatriates in the more terrorism-exposed context perceive fear less strongly than expatriates in environments categorised by high degrees of conventional crime. Fear seems to relate to physical well-being via restricted freedom of movement, but there is little evidence that fear affects mental well-being. The study finds that respondents in terror-exposed Nairobi tend to engage more in avoidance-oriented coping strategies, whereas their counterparts in the high-crime environment of Johannesburg predominantly rely on problem-focused coping.   Practical implications  The qualitative design allows practitioners to better understand expatriates’ perceptions of fear, its consequences for stress, and well-being and potential coping strategies expatriates employ. It discusses a set of practical recommendations focussing on the deployment of expatriates assigned to dangerous locations.   Originality/value  This study develops a distinction between terror and conventional crime and contributes with practical insights for assignments into dangerous work environments. The geographic lens of the study provides an in-depth look at expatriation challenges in an arguably neglected regional context.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherEmeralden_UK
dc.relationFaeth PC & Kittler M (2017) How do you fear? Examining expatriates' perception of danger and its consequences. Journal of Global Mobility, 5 (4), pp. 391-417. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGM-11-2016-0063en_UK
dc.rights© Copyright 2017 Emerald Publishing Limited. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Journal of Global Mobility following peer review. The version of record, How do you fear? Examining expatriates’ perception of danger and its consequences, Pia Charlotte Faeth and Markus G. Kittler, Journal of Global Mobility: The Home of Expatriate Management Research 2017 5:4, 391-417, is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1108/JGM-11-2016-0063. This article is deposited under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial International Licence 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0). Any reuse is allowed in accordance with the terms outlined by the licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). To reuse the AAM for commercial purposes, permission should be sought by contacting permissions@emeraldinsight.com.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectWell-beingen_UK
dc.subjectTerrorismen_UK
dc.subjectStressen_UK
dc.subjectCopingen_UK
dc.subjectFearen_UK
dc.subjectCrimeen_UK
dc.subjectExpatriate managementen_UK
dc.titleHow do you fear? Examining expatriates' perception of danger and its consequencesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/JGM-11-2016-0063en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Global Mobilityen_UK
dc.citation.issn2049-8799en_UK
dc.citation.volume5en_UK
dc.citation.issue4en_UK
dc.citation.spage391en_UK
dc.citation.epage417en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.citation.date11/12/2017en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationManagement, Work and Organisationen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationManagement, Work and Organisationen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000416459900004en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85035764842en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid508290en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0149-3789en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0240-2524en_UK
dc.date.accepted2017-08-02en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-08-02en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2017-12-15en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorFaeth, Pia Charlotte|0000-0002-0149-3789en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKittler, Markus|0000-0003-0240-2524en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2017-12-15en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/|2017-12-15|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamePaper Faeth and Kittler (2017).pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2049-8799en_UK
Appears in Collections:Management, Work and Organisation Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Paper Faeth and Kittler (2017).pdfFulltext - Accepted Version1.32 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.