Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26272
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBeake, Sarahen_UK
dc.contributor.authorChang, Yan-Shingen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCheyne, Helenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSpiby, Helenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSandall, Janeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBick, Debraen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-16T01:00:04Z-
dc.date.available2018-01-16T01:00:04Z-
dc.date.issued2018-02en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/26272-
dc.description.abstractObjectives  To examine evidence of women's, labour companions’ and health professionals’ experiences of management of early labour to consider how this could be enhanced to better reflect women's needs.  Design  A systematic review of qualitative evidence.  Setting and participants  Women in early labour with term, low risk singleton pregnancies, not booked for a planned caesarean birth or post-dates induction of labour, their labour companions, and health professionals responsible for early labour care (e.g. midwives, nurse-midwives, obstetricians, family doctors). Studies from high and middle income country settings were considered.  Findings  21 publications were included from the UK, Ireland, Scandinavia, USA, Italy and New Zealand. Key findings included the impact of communication with health professionals (most usually midwives) on women's decision making; women wanting to be listened to by sympathetic midwives who could reassure that symptoms and signs of early labour were ‘normal’ and offer clear advice on what to do. Antenatal preparation which included realistic information on what to expect when labour commenced was important and appreciated by women and labour companions. Views of the optimal place for women to remain and allow early labour to progress differed and the perceived benefit of support and help offered by labour companions varied. Some were supportive and helped women to relax, while others were anxious and encouraged women to seek early admission to the planned place of birth. Web-based sources of information are increasingly used by women, with mixed views of the value of information accessed.  Key conclusions and implications for practice  Women, labour companions and health professionals find early labour difficult to manage well, with women unsure of how decisions about admission to their planned place of birth are taken. It is unclear why women are effectively left to manage this aspect of their labour with minimal guidance or support. Tailoring management to meet individual needs, with provision of effective communication could reassure women and facilitate timely admission from perspectives of women, their companions, midwives and other health professionals. Information on labour onset and progress, and approaches to pain management, should be shared with women's labour companions to enable them to feel more confident to better support women. Further research is needed of the impact of different models of care and increasing use of web-based information on women's approaches to self-management when labour commences.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationBeake S, Chang Y, Cheyne H, Spiby H, Sandall J & Bick D (2018) Experiences of early labour management from perspectives of women, labour companions and health professionals: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Midwifery, 57, pp. 69-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.11.002en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Accepted refereed manuscript of: Beake S, Chang Y, Cheyne H, Spiby H, Sandall J & Bick D (2018) Experiences of early labour management from perspectives of women, labour companions and health professionals: A systematic review of qualitative evidence, Midwifery, 57, pp. 69-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.11.002 © 2017, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectEarly labouren_UK
dc.subjectLatent phaseen_UK
dc.subjectLabour onseten_UK
dc.subjectExperiencesen_UK
dc.subjectQualitative synthesisen_UK
dc.titleExperiences of early labour management from perspectives of women, labour companions and health professionals: A systematic review of qualitative evidenceen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2018-11-14en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[1-s2.0-S0266613817304606-main.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.midw.2017.11.002en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid29223042en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleMidwiferyen_UK
dc.citation.issn0266-6138en_UK
dc.citation.volume57en_UK
dc.citation.spage69en_UK
dc.citation.epage84en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailh.l.cheyne@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date13/11/2017en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationKing's College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationKing's College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationKing's College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationKing's College Londonen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000418506400010en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85037328141en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid512667en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5738-8390en_UK
dc.date.accepted2017-11-03en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-11-03en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2017-12-01en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBeake, Sarah|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorChang, Yan-Shing|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCheyne, Helen|0000-0001-5738-8390en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSpiby, Helen|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSandall, Jane|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBick, Debra|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2018-11-14en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2018-11-13en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2018-11-14|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1-s2.0-S0266613817304606-main.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0266-6138en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0266613817304606-main.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version1.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.