Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26264
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCopplestone, Daviden_UK
dc.contributor.authorHirth, Gillianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorJohansen, Maten_UK
dc.contributor.authorLazo, Edwarden_UK
dc.contributor.authorTakala, Johnen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSakai, Kazuoen_UK
dc.contributor.authorYankovich, Tamara Len_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-20T04:08:53Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-20T04:08:53Z-
dc.date.issued2018-10en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/26264-
dc.description.abstractThe ICRP recognises three types of exposure situations (planned, existing and emergency). In all three situations, the release of radionuclides into the natural environment leads to exposures of non-human biota, as well as the potential for exposures of the public. This paper describes how the key principles of the ICRP system of radiological protection apply to non-human biota and members of the public in each of these exposure situations. Current work in this area within ICRP Task Group (TG) 105 is highlighted. For example, how simplified numeric criteria may be used in planned exposure situations that are protective of both the public and non-human biota. In emergency exposure situations, the initial response will always be focused on human protection however, understanding the potential impacts of radionuclide releases on non-human biota will likely become important in terms of communication as governments and the public seek to understand the exposures that are occurring. For existing exposure situations, we need to better understand the potential impacts of radionuclides on animals and plants especially when deciding on protective actions. Understanding the comparative impacts from radiological, non-radiological and physical aspects is often important in managing remediating legacy sites. The TG is making use of case studies of how exposure situations have been managed in the past to provide additional guidance and advice for the protection of non-human biota.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSAGEen_UK
dc.relationCopplestone D, Hirth G, Johansen M, Lazo E, Takala J, Sakai K & Yankovich TL (2018) Implementation of the Integrated Approach in Different Types of Exposure Scenarios. Annals of the ICRP, 47 (3-4), pp. 304-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645318756837en_UK
dc.rightsCopplestone D, Hirth G, Johansen M, Lazo E, Takala J, Sakai K & Yankovich TL, Implementation of the Integrated Approach in Different Types of Exposure Scenarios, Annals of the ICRP, 47 (3-4) pp. 304-312. Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications. Reuse is restricted to non-commercial and no derivative uses. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645318756837en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectRadiological protectionen_UK
dc.subjectEnvironmental protectionen_UK
dc.subjectExposure situationsen_UK
dc.subjectNon-human biotaen_UK
dc.titleImplementation of the Integrated Approach in Different Types of Exposure Scenariosen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0146645318756837en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid29648459en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleAnnals of the ICRPen_UK
dc.citation.issn0146-6453en_UK
dc.citation.volume47en_UK
dc.citation.issue3-4en_UK
dc.citation.spage304en_UK
dc.citation.epage312en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emaildavid.copplestone@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date12/04/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationAustralian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agencyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationAustralian Nuclear Science and Technology (ANSTO)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationOECD Nuclear Energy Agencyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCameco Corporationen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationTokyo Healthcare Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInternational Atomic Energy Agencyen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85045271342en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid882717en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1468-9545en_UK
dc.date.accepted2017-11-27en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-11-27en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2017-11-30en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorCopplestone, David|0000-0002-1468-9545en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHirth, Gillian|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJohansen, Mat|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLazo, Edward|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTakala, John|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSakai, Kazuo|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorYankovich, Tamara L|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2018-04-12en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2018-04-12en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2018-04-12|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename28 Copplestone Paper final 2017-11-27.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0146-6453en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
28 Copplestone Paper final 2017-11-27.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version450.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.