Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26236
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Recruiting pregnant indigenous women who smoke into a high contact incentivized cessation trial: A feasibility study
Authors: Kira, Anette
Glover, Marewa
Walker, Natalie
Bauld, Linda
Contact Email: linda.bauld@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: pregnancy
smoking
patient referral
smoking cessation
advertising
deception
health personnel
minority groups
new zealand
smoke
incentives
lost to follow-up
social media
Issue Date: Oct-2016
Citation: Kira A, Glover M, Walker N & Bauld L (2016) Recruiting pregnant indigenous women who smoke into a high contact incentivized cessation trial: A feasibility study, Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 18 (10), pp. 2036-2040.
Abstract: Introduction:  Smoking prevalence among pregnant indigenous women is disproportionately higher than for nonindigenous pregnant women. Incentives have been shown to increase retention in and the effectiveness of smoking cessation programs. To trial if this could work for indigenous women, we aimed to recruit and observe retention of Māori (New Zealand indigenous people) pregnant women that smoke into a cessation program using incentives.  Methods:  A parallel group, randomized controlled feasibility trial was undertaken in New Zealand. Pregnant Māori women who smoked were recruited through health practitioners, social media, and general media advertising. Outcomes included ease of recruitment, enrollment rate, retention, cost, and time and distance traveled to visit participants.  Results:  Seventy-four women were referred for the trial over 7 months. The highest enrollment rate was among self-referrals from media (6 of 10), then women referred from cessation providers (47%, 8 of 17). About three-quarters of women referred from health professionals did not enroll. Only 32% (24) were randomized. Nine women completed the intervention, three withdrew, and 12 were lost to follow-up. On average, it took less time to contact abstinent participants (29 vs. 43 minutes for nonabstinent women). No deception was noted.  Conclusions:  Recruitment was difficult and varied by source of first contact. Once enrolled, it was feasible to maintain intensive contact with participants who stayed engaged. The number lost to follow-up was high. We concluded that the tenor of trial promotion could have influenced recruitment and retention rates. Further research with indigenous women is needed to identify better recruitment and retention methods.  Implication:  With the rising cost of research and the increased competition for funds, it is important to have evidence that intervention studies with minority group pregnant women who smoke are feasible. Maintaining contact with participants seemed feasible, but the tenor of trial promotion and type of recruitment strategy could influence enrollment and retention of sufficient numbers of participants. Nonjudgmental supportive advertising and invitations direct to women may work better than relying on health professionals as recruiters.
DOI Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw106
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ntw106.pdf207 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 31/12/2999     Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.