Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/25988
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcCartney, Elspethen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBishop, Dorothy V Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorSnowling, Margaret Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Paul Aen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGreenhalgh, Trishaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-17T00:24:57Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-17T00:24:57Z-
dc.date.issued2017-10en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/25988-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Lack of agreement about criteria and terminology for children?s language problems affects access to services as well as hindering research and practice. We report the second phase of a study using an online Delphi method to address these issues. In the first phase, we focused on criteria for language disorder. Here we consider terminology.  Methods: The Delphi method is an iterative process in which an initial set of statements is rated by a panel of experts, who then have the opportunity to view anonymised ratings from other panel members. On this basis they can either revise their views or make a case for their position. The statements are then revised based on panel feedback, and again rated by and commented on by the panel. In this study, feedback from a second round was used to prepare a final set of statements in narrative form. The panel included 57 individuals representing a range of professions and nationalities.  Results: We achieved at least 78\% agreement for 19 of 21 statements within two rounds of ratings. The term ?Language Disorder? is recommended to refer to a profile of difficulties that causes functional impairment in everyday life and is associated with poor prognosis. The term, ?Developmental Language Disorder? (DLD) was endorsed for use when the language disorder was not associated with a known biomedical aetiology. It was also agreed that (1) presence of risk factors (neurobiological or environmental) does not preclude a diagnosis of DLD, (2) DLD can co-occur with other neurodevelopmental disorders (e.g., ADHD), and (3) DLD does not require a mismatch between verbal and nonverbal ability.  Conclusions: This Delphi exercise highlights reasons for disagreements about terminology for language disorders and proposes standard definitions and nomenclatureen_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_UK
dc.relationMcCartney E, Bishop DVM, Snowling MJ, Thompson PA & Greenhalgh T (2017) Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58 (10), pp. 1068-1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12721en_UK
dc.rights© 2017 The Authors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectDevelopmental language disorderen_UK
dc.subjectspecific language impairmenten_UK
dc.subjectterminologyen_UK
dc.subjectrisk factorsen_UK
dc.subjectdefinitionsen_UK
dc.titlePhase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminologyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jcpp.12721en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid28369935en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatryen_UK
dc.citation.issn1469-7610en_UK
dc.citation.issn0021-9630en_UK
dc.citation.volume58en_UK
dc.citation.issue10en_UK
dc.citation.spage1068en_UK
dc.citation.epage1080en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.citation.date30/03/2017en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEducationen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Oxforden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Oxforden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Oxforden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Oxforden_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000411064900002en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85016940011en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid517096en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6234-0348en_UK
dc.date.accepted2017-02-22en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-02-22en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2017-10-16en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcCartney, Elspeth|0000-0002-6234-0348en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBishop, Dorothy V M|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSnowling, Margaret J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorThompson, Paul A|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGreenhalgh, Trisha|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2017-10-16en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2017-10-16|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameBishop_et_al-1068-Journal_of_Child_Psychology_and_Psychiatry.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0021-9630en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Bishop_et_al-1068-Journal_of_Child_Psychology_and_Psychiatry.pdfFulltext - Published Version279.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.