Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/25909
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPearson, Jenniferen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHitchman, Sara Cen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBrose, Leonie Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBauld, Lindaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGlasser, Allison Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorVillanti, Andrea Cen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcNeill, Annen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAbrams, Daviden_UK
dc.contributor.authorCohen, Joanna Een_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-04T01:13:59Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-04T01:13:59Z-
dc.date.issued2018-05en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/25909-
dc.description.abstractA consistent approach using standardised items to assess e-cigarette use in both youth and adult populations will aid cross-survey and cross-national comparisons of the effect of e-cigarette (and tobacco) policies and improve our understanding of the population health impact of e-cigarette use. Focusing on adult behaviour, we propose a set of e-cigarette use items, discuss their utility and potential adaptation, and highlight e-cigarette constructs that researchers should avoid without further item development. Reliable and valid items will strengthen the emerging science and inform knowledge synthesis for policy-making. Building on informal discussions at a series of international meetings of 65 experts from 15 countries, the authors provide recommendations for assessing e-cigarette use behaviour, relative perceived harm, device type, presence of nicotine, flavours and reasons for use. We recommend items assessing eight core constructs: e-cigarette ever use, frequency of use and former daily use; relative perceived harm; device type; primary flavour preference; presence of nicotine; and primary reason for use. These items should be standardised or minimally adapted for the policy context and target population. Researchers should be prepared to update items as e-cigarette device characteristics change. A minimum set of e-cigarette items is proposed to encourage consensus around items to allow for cross-survey and cross-jurisdictional comparisons of e-cigarette use behaviour. These proposed items are a starting point. We recognise room for continued improvement, and welcome input from e-cigarette users and scientific colleagues.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_UK
dc.relationPearson J, Hitchman SC, Brose LS, Bauld L, Glasser AM, Villanti AC, McNeill A, Abrams D & Cohen JE (2018) Recommended core items to assess e-cigarette use in population-based surveys. Tobacco Control, 27 (3), pp. 341-346. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053541en_UK
dc.rightsPublisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Tobacco Control by BMJ Publishing. The original publication is available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053541en_UK
dc.subjectElectronic nicotine delivery devicesen_UK
dc.subjectPublic policyen_UK
dc.subjectSurveillance and monitoringen_UK
dc.titleRecommended core items to assess e-cigarette use in population-based surveysen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053541en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid28624764en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleTobacco Controlen_UK
dc.citation.issn1468-3318en_UK
dc.citation.issn0964-4563en_UK
dc.citation.volume27en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.spage341en_UK
dc.citation.epage346en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderMedical Research Councilen_UK
dc.citation.date17/06/2017en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationKing's College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationKing's College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationTruth Initiativeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationJohns Hopkins Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationKing's College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationJohns Hopkins Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationJohns Hopkins Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000430496600027en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85060283084en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid883440en_UK
dc.date.accepted2017-05-09en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-05-09en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2017-09-26en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorPearson, Jennifer|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHitchman, Sara C|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBrose, Leonie S|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBauld, Linda|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGlasser, Allison M|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorVillanti, Andrea C|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcNeill, Ann|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAbrams, David|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCohen, Joanna E|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Medical Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2017-09-26en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2017-09-26|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename20170407 - Pearson et al - Ecig measurement - revision submisison.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0964-4563en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
20170407 - Pearson et al - Ecig measurement - revision submisison.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version317.34 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.