Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/25863
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorClague, Fionaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMercer, Stewart Wen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcLean, Garyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorReynish, Emmaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGuthrie, Bruceen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-18T22:30:01Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-18T22:30:01Z-
dc.date.issued2017-01en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/25863-
dc.description.abstractBackground: the care of older people with dementia is often complicated by physical comorbidity and polypharmacy, but the extent and patterns of these have not been well described. This paper reports analysis of these factors within a large, cross-sectional primary care data set. Methods: data were extracted for 291,169 people aged 65 years or older registered with 314 general practices in the UK, of whom 10,258 had an electronically recorded dementia diagnosis. Differences in the number and type of 32 physical conditions and the number of repeat prescriptions in those with and without dementia were examined. Age-gender standardised rates were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) of physical comorbidity and polypharmacy. Results: people with dementia, after controlling for age and sex, had on average more physical conditions than controls (mean number of conditions 2.9 versus 2.4; P < 0.001) and were on more repeat medication (mean number of repeats 5.4 versus 4.2; P < 0.001). Those with dementia were more likely to have 5 or more physical conditions (age-sex standardised OR [sOR] 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35-1.50; P < 0.001) and were also more likely to be on 5 or more (sOR 1.46; 95% CI 1.40-1.52; P < 0.001) or 10 or more repeat prescriptions (sOR 2.01; 95% CI 1.90-2.12; P < 0.001). Conclusions: people with dementia have a higher burden of comorbid physical disease and polypharmacy than those without dementia, even after accounting for age and sex differences. Such complex needs require an integrated response from general health professionals and multidisciplinary dementia specialists.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_UK
dc.relationClague F, Mercer SW, McLean G, Reynish E & Guthrie B (2017) Comorbidity and polypharmacy in people with dementia: insights from a large, population-based cross-sectional analysis of primary care data. Age and Ageing, 46 (1), pp. 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afw176en_UK
dc.rightsThis is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Age and Ageing following peer review. The version of record Clague F, Mercer SW, McLean G, Reynish E & Guthrie B, Comorbidity and polypharmacy in people with dementia: insights from a large, population-based cross-sectional analysis of primary care data, Age and Ageing, Volume 46, Issue 1, 19 January 2017, Pages 33–39, is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afw176en_UK
dc.subjectolder peopleen_UK
dc.subjectcomorbidityen_UK
dc.subjectmulti-morbidityen_UK
dc.subjectdementiaen_UK
dc.subjectAlzheimer's diseaseen_UK
dc.subjectpolypharmacyen_UK
dc.titleComorbidity and polypharmacy in people with dementia: insights from a large, population-based cross-sectional analysis of primary care dataen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ageing/afw176en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid28181629en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleAge and Ageingen_UK
dc.citation.issn1468-2834en_UK
dc.citation.issn0002-0729en_UK
dc.citation.volume46en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage33en_UK
dc.citation.epage39en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailemma.reynish@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date13/10/2016en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationMurray Royal Hospitalen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationDementia Services Development Centreen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000398086600009en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85018267112en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid532570en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9076-3911en_UK
dc.date.accepted2016-09-13en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-09-13en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2017-09-12en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorClague, Fiona|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMercer, Stewart W|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcLean, Gary|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorReynish, Emma|0000-0002-9076-3911en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGuthrie, Bruce|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2017-09-12en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2017-09-12|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename120720.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0002-0729en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
120720.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version443.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.