Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Sufficiency and relevance of information for inpatients in general ward settings: a qualitative exploration of information exchange between patients and nurses (Forthcoming/Available Online)
Authors: Crispin, Vivianne
Bugge, Carol
Stoddart, Kathleen
Contact Email:
Keywords: Information exchange
multiple-case study design
observational research
patient/nurse interactions
shared decision-making
Issue Date: 22-Jul-2017
Citation: Crispin V, Bugge C & Stoddart K (2017) Sufficiency and relevance of information for inpatients in general ward settings: a qualitative exploration of information exchange between patients and nurses (Forthcoming/Available Online), International Journal of Nursing Studies.
Abstract: Background  Information exchange as part of shared decision-making is widely discussed in research and policy literature as a means of improving patient involvement in treatment and care. To date information exchange between patients and nurses has not been explored in ward contexts.  Objective  To explore the sufficiency of, and intentions behind, information exchanged by patients and nurses in surgical and medical ward settings using a recognised model of shared decision-making.  Design  A multiple-case study design was used. Data were collected from 19 cases. Each case comprised one patient, the nurses interacting with that patient, the interactions between them, and their perceptions about the interactions.  Settings  The study was undertaken across six surgical, six medical and one rehabilitation ward in a large teaching hospital in the United Kingdom.  Participants  Purposive sampling was used to first recruit nurses and then patients. Inclusion criteria included nurses registered with the Nursing and Midwifery Council, and patients who had been in hospital for more than 24 hours and who could consent to participating. Twenty-two nurses and 19 patients participated.  Methods  Interactions from 19 cases were observed and audio-recorded. Individual interviews with patients and nurses followed, and were related to, the observed interactions.  Results  Patients and nurses perceived they had exchanged sufficient information for their own needs including patient involvement, due to: information being shared previously and on an ongoing basis; having asked all their questions; therapeutic patient/nurse relationships; and, nurses speaking in lay terms. In contrast, the observational data suggested that insufficient information was exchanged between patients and nurses due to: lost opportunities for sharing information; paternalistic practice; and withholding information.  Conclusion  The elements of information exchange within a recognised model of shared decision-making do not adequately fit with patient/nurse interactions in ward settings. Participants generally perceived they had given and received enough information for their own needs. Therefore, the ways in which patients and nurses currently interact, could remain as they are. Policymakers should be aware of the varying contexts where healthcare staff work, and should promote information exchange and shared decision-making more strategically. Due to the complexities of patient/nurse interactions, consideration should be given to situation and context when applying these findings to practice.
DOI Link:
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Crispin Sufficiency paper IJNS 2017.pdf565.06 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 23/7/2018     Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.