Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/25523
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Conference Papers and Proceedings
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Authors: Copplestone, David
Larsson, Carl-Magnus
Strand, Per
Sneve, Malgorzata K
Contact Email: david.copplestone@stir.ac.uk
Title: Protection of the environment in existing exposure situations
Citation: Copplestone D, Larsson C, Strand P & Sneve MK (2016) Protection of the environment in existing exposure situations In: , SAGE. ICRP 2015 - Third International Symposium on the System of Radiological Protection, 20.10.2015 - 22.10.2015, Seoul, South Korea, Annals of the ICRP, 45 (1_suppl), pp. 91-105.
Issue Date: Jun-2016
Conference Name: ICRP 2015 - Third International Symposium on the System of Radiological Protection
Conference Dates: 2015-10-20T00:00:00Z
Conference Location: Seoul, South Korea
Abstract: The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) described its approach to the protection of the environment and how it should be applied inPublication 124. The report expanded on the Commission’s objectives for environmental protection, and how the Derived Consideration Reference Levels (DCRLs) apply within different exposure situations. DCRLs relate radiation effects to doses over and above their normal local background radiation levels, and consider different potential pathways of exposure for animals and plants. This paper will describe how the DCRLs may be used within existing exposure situations to better understand the potential impacts on animals and plants. In these circumstances, the Commission recommends that the aim be to reduce exposures to levels that are within the DCRL bands (or even below, depending upon the potential cost/benefits), but with full consideration of the radiological and non-radiological consequences of doing so. Using examples, this paper will demonstrate how this may be achieved in practice, bearing in mind the potential exposure of humans, animals and plants during and following any remediation attempted.
Status: Publisher version (final published refereed version)
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
URL: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0146645316630167

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
11 David Copplestone Paper 2015 Fourth Proof.pdf251.89 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 31/12/2999     Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.