|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Understanding the applicability of results from primary care trials: lessons learned from applying PRECIS-2|
|Keywords:||Randomized controlled trials|
Clinical trial methodology
|Citation:||Forbes G, Loudon K, Treweek S, Taylor S & Eldridge S (2017) Understanding the applicability of results from primary care trials: lessons learned from applying PRECIS-2, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 90, pp. 119-126.|
|Abstract:||Objective To compare two approaches for trial teams to apply PRECIS-2 to pragmatic trials: independent scoring and scoring following a group discussion. Study Design and Setting We recruited multidisciplinary teams who were conducting or had conducted trials in primary care in collaboration with the Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London. Each team carried out two rounds of scoring on the 9 PRECIS-2 domains: first independently using an online version of PRECIS-2 and secondly following a discussion. Results Seven teams took part in the study. Prior to the discussion within-team agreement in scores was generally poor and not all raters were able to score all domains; agreement improved following the discussion. The PRECIS-2 wheels suggested that the trials were pragmatic, though some domains were more pragmatic than others. Conclusion PRECIS-2 can facilitate information exchange within trial teams. To apply PRECIS-2 successfully we recommend a discussion between those with detailed understanding of: what usual care is for the intervention, the trial’s design including operational and technical aspects, and the PRECIS-2 domains. For some cluster randomised trials greater insight may be gained by plotting two PRECIS-2 wheels, one at the individual participant level and one at the cluster level.|
|Rights:||This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Accepted refereed manuscript of: Forbes G, Loudon K, Treweek S, Taylor S & Eldridge S (2017) Understanding the applicability of results from primary care trials: lessons learned from applying PRECIS-2, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 90, pp. 119-126. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.007 © 2017, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|
|Forbes_etal_JCE_2017.pdf||1.43 MB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 8/6/2018 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.