Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/25386
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: The International Economy of Children’s rights: issues in translation
Authors: I'Anson, John
Quennerstedt, Ann
Robinson, Carol
Contact Email: john.ianson@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: UNCRC
translation
international economy of rights
ethics
morality
technicalization
responsibility
consensus
Issue Date: 2017
Citation: I'Anson J, Quennerstedt A & Robinson C (2017) The International Economy of Children’s rights: issues in translation, International Journal of Children's Rights, 25 (1), pp. 50-67.
Abstract: The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) is an international legal text that necessitates multiple translations into national policy contexts if it is to become mobilised within professional practice. The aim of this paper is to foreground this process of translation and to identify some of the limitations inherent within present mobilisations of the UNCRC. On the basis of this diagnosis, we then raise a series of ethical considerations that might inform a more critical and open-ended approach.  We characterise current approaches to mobilising the UNCRC as an international economy of rights and we represent this diagrammatically. This economy, we contend, involves multiple translations of the UNCRC text into a series of performative demands to which adults become accountable in situations of professional practice with children and young people.  We then critically analyse this economy as presently instituted and point to a number of inherent limitations. We argue that a failure to address the issue of translation from legal text to relational practice has led to a technical resolution. The potential challenge of the UNCRC as an authoritative text of critique is further weakened by the promotion of a consensus thinking that privileges agreement over the complexities associated with ethical thinking. In the light of this critique, the paper identifies new lines of questioning to inform debate concerning how a children’s rights agenda might be refracted differently in future.
DOI Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02501004
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in The International Journal of Children's Rights, Volume 25, Issue 1, pages 50–67 by Brill. The original publication is available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02501004

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Paper_for_Int_J_of_Childrens_Rights_Submitted_2017.pdf598.25 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 1/7/2019     Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.