Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/25234
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMuinzer, Thomasen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-30T23:42:01Z-
dc.date.available2017-03-30T23:42:01Z-
dc.date.issued2015en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/25234-
dc.description.abstractFirst paragraph: This analysis examines two important judicial reviews concerning financial supports for solar photovoltaic (PV) systems:Solar Century Holdings Limited & Others v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change(hereafterSolar Century),1andBreyer Group Plc and Others v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change(hereafterBreyer Group).2The former case concerns large-scale PV systems, and the latter case concerns small-scale systems. The following analysis begins by addressing the background, arguments and reasoning underpinningSolar Century, then proceeds to treat these elements inBreyer Group. A Commentary section then juxtaposes and compares both of the decisions.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSAGEen_UK
dc.relationMuinzer T (2015) “To PV or not to PV”: An Analysis of the High Court’s Recent Treatment of Solar Energy. Environmental Law Review, 17 (2), pp. 128-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461452915576870en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectsolar energyen_UK
dc.subjectphotovoltaicsen_UK
dc.subjectrenewables obligationen_UK
dc.subjectfeed-in tariffsen_UK
dc.subjectjudicial reviewen_UK
dc.title“To PV or not to PV”: An Analysis of the High Court’s Recent Treatment of Solar Energyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-02en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[1461452915576870.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1461452915576870en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEnvironmental Law Reviewen_UK
dc.citation.issn1740-5564en_UK
dc.citation.issn1461-4529en_UK
dc.citation.volume17en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage128en_UK
dc.citation.epage135en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailthomas.muinzer@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date01/06/2015en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLawen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid532275en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-06-01en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2017-03-30en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMuinzer, Thomas|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-02en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1461452915576870.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1461-4529en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1461452915576870.pdfFulltext - Published Version139.72 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-02    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.