Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/25133
Appears in Collections:Economics Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Can Early Intervention Improve Maternal Well-Being? Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial
Authors: Doyle, Orla M
Delaney, Liam
O'Farrelly, Christine
Fitzpatrick, Nick
Daly, Michael
Issue Date: 17-Jan-2017
Citation: Doyle OM, Delaney L, O'Farrelly C, Fitzpatrick N & Daly M (2017) Can Early Intervention Improve Maternal Well-Being? Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial, PLoS ONE, 12 (1), Art. No.: e0169829.
Abstract: Objective   This study estimates the effect of a targeted early childhood intervention program on global and experienced measures of maternal well-being utilizing a randomized controlled trial design. The primary aim of the intervention is to improve children’s school readiness skills by working directly with parents to improve their knowledge of child development and parenting behavior. One potential externality of the program is well-being benefits for parents given its direct focus on improving parental coping, self-efficacy, and problem solving skills, as well as generating an indirect effect on parental well-being by targeting child developmental problems.  Methods   Participants from a socio-economically disadvantaged community are randomly assigned during pregnancy to an intensive 5-year home visiting parenting program or a control group. We estimate and compare treatment effects on multiple measures of global and experienced well-being using permutation testing to account for small sample size and a stepdown procedure to account for multiple testing.  Results  The intervention has no impact on global well-being as measured by life satisfaction and parenting stress or experienced negative affect using episodic reports derived from the Day Reconstruction Method (DRM). Treatment effects are observed on measures of experienced positive affect derived from the DRM and a measure of mood yesterday.  Conclusion   The limited treatment effects suggest that early intervention programs may produce some improvements in experienced positive well-being, but no effects on negative aspects of well-being. Different findings across measures may result as experienced measures of well-being avoid the cognitive biases that impinge upon global assessments.
DOI Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169829
Rights: © 2017 Doyle et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
journal.pone.0169829.pdf1.87 MBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.