Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/24964
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRuffino, Jose Sofiaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSongsorn, Preeyaphornen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHaggett, Malindien_UK
dc.contributor.authorEdmonds, Danielen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Anthony Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Dylanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorVollaard, Nielsen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-25T22:49:47Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-25T22:49:47Z-
dc.date.issued2017-02en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/24964-
dc.description.abstractReduced-exertion high-intensity interval training (REHIT) is a genuinely time-efficient intervention that can improve aerobic capacity and insulin sensitivity in sedentary individuals. The present study compared the effects of REHIT and moderate-intensity walking on health markers in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in a counter-balanced crossover study. Sixteen men with T2D (mean ± SD age: 55 ± 5 years, body mass index: 30.6 ± 2.8 kg·m−2, maximal aerobic capacity: 27 ± 4 mL·kg−1·min−1) completed 8 weeks of REHIT (three 10-min low-intensity cycling sessions/week with two “all-out” 10–20-s sprints) and 8 weeks of moderate-intensity walking (five 30-min sessions/week at an intensity corresponding to 40%–55% of heart-rate reserve), with a 2-month wash-out period between interventions. Before and after each intervention, participants underwent an incremental fitness test, an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), a whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan, and continuous glucose monitoring. REHIT was associated with a significantly larger increase in maximal aerobic capacity compared with walking (7% vs. 1%; time × intervention interaction effect:p< 0.05). Both REHIT and walking decreased resting mean arterial pressure (−4%; main effect of time:p< 0.05) and plasma fructosamine (−5%; main effect of time:p< 0.05). Neither intervention significantly improved OGTT-derived measures of insulin sensitivity, glycaemic control measured using continuous glucose monitors, blood lipid profile, or body composition. We conclude that REHIT is superior to a 5-fold larger volume of moderate-intensity walking in improving aerobic fitness, but similar to walking REHIT is not an effective intervention for improving insulin sensitivity or glycaemic control in T2D patients in the short term.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherNRC Research Pressen_UK
dc.relationRuffino JS, Songsorn P, Haggett M, Edmonds D, Robinson AM, Thompson D & Vollaard N (2017) A comparison of the health benefits of reduced-exertion high-intensity interval training (REHIT) and moderate-intensity walking in type 2 diabetes patients. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 42 (2), pp. 202-208. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2016-0497en_UK
dc.rightsPublished by NRC Research Press in Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 2017, 42.2, pp. 202-208. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2016-0497en_UK
dc.subjectHITen_UK
dc.subjectsprint interval training (SIT)en_UK
dc.subjectglycaemic controlen_UK
dc.subjectV̇O2maxen_UK
dc.subjectblood pressureen_UK
dc.titleA comparison of the health benefits of reduced-exertion high-intensity interval training (REHIT) and moderate-intensity walking in type 2 diabetes patientsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1139/apnm-2016-0497en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid28121184en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleApplied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolismen_UK
dc.citation.issn1715-5320en_UK
dc.citation.issn1715-5312en_UK
dc.citation.volume42en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage202en_UK
dc.citation.epage208en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailn.vollaard@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date28/10/2016en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bathen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bathen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bathen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bathen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRoyal United Hospitals Bathen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bathen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSporten_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000395434400011en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85011394765en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid536008en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4576-8879en_UK
dc.date.accepted2016-10-24en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-10-24en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2017-02-10en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorRuffino, Jose Sofia|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSongsorn, Preeyaphorn|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHaggett, Malindi|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorEdmonds, Daniel|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRobinson, Anthony M|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorThompson, Dylan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorVollaard, Niels|0000-0002-4576-8879en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2017-02-10en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2017-02-10|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameRuffino et al APNM 2016 final.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1715-5312en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ruffino et al APNM 2016 final.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version628.51 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.