|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Social Sciences Conference Papers and Proceedings|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||"Punishment, in fact, did not resolve the problem": The judicial perspectives on the sentencing of minor drug offenders in Indonesia|
|Citation:||Mustafa C (2016) "Punishment, in fact, did not resolve the problem": The judicial perspectives on the sentencing of minor drug offenders in Indonesia In: Seal L, Jones H (ed.), London: British Society of Criminology. BSC Annual Conference 2016: Inequalities in a diverse world, 6.7.2016 - 8.7.2016, Nottingham, Papers from the British Criminology Conference, 16, pp. 93-110.|
|Conference Name:||BSC Annual Conference 2016: Inequalities in a diverse world|
|Abstract:||The purpose of this study is to explore the judicial perspectives on the sentencing of minor drug offenders; In order to understand the judiciary perspectives, it is important, as is the focus of this study in the case of Indonesia, to explore the judicial perspectives under social conditions where they operate (Hutton, 2006). The methodological design draws upon qualitative methods in order to undertake micro/meso levels of analysis. It comprises of the following phases: an in-depth case study of two Indonesian district courts ; and semi-structured interviews with key experts from the Indonesian Supreme court. Judges perceive drug offences as global concern and more serious. Judges feel being constrained by prosecutor's indictment, appellate procedure, medical assessment, and the availability treatment facilities. Rehabilitation for minor drug offender were seen as being in the interests of judges and the society.|
|Status:||Post-print (author final draft post-refereeing)|
|Rights:||Author's Accepted Manuscript: The publisher does not allow this version of the work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
Publisher version: The publisher has granted permission for use of this work in this Repository. Published in Papers from the British Criminology Conference, Volume 16 by the British Society of Criminology: http://www.britsoccrim.org/publications/pbcc/
|BSC Journal Submission006comments accepted.pdf||Author's Accepted Manuscript||327.78 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 31/12/2999 Request a copy|
|pbcc_2016_Mustafa.pdf||Publisher version||747.92 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.