Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/24596
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: The Mental Toughness Questionnaire-48: A Re-examination of Factorial Validity
Author(s): Birch, Phil D J
Crampton, Simon
Greenlees, Iain
Lowry, Ruth
Coffee, Pete
Contact Email: peter.coffee@stir.ac.uk
Issue Date: May-2017
Date Deposited: 23-Nov-2016
Citation: Birch PDJ, Crampton S, Greenlees I, Lowry R & Coffee P (2017) The Mental Toughness Questionnaire-48: A Re-examination of Factorial Validity. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 48 (3), pp. 331-355. https://doi.org/10.7352/IJSP.2017.48.331
Abstract: The Mental Toughness Questionnaire-48 (MTQ48; Clough, Earle, & Sewell, 2002) is the most utilised instrument to measure Mental Toughness in sport (Gucciardi, Hanton, & Mallett, 2012). To date, preliminary research (Gucciardi et al., 2012; Perry et al., 2013) examining the factorial validity 26 the MTQ48 in athlete samples has yielded equivocal findings. The aim of this paper was to re-examine the factorial validity of the four- and six-factor models of the MTQ48 in moderate (n = 480) and large (n = 1206) independent student athlete samples. Using confirmatory factor analyses, findings revealed little support for the hypothesised models of the MTQ48 in both samples. The results support those found by Gucciardi et al. and Perry et al. and suggest that, in its current form, the MTQ48 may not be a valid measure of the 4/6Cs model of mental toughness when using student athletes.
DOI Link: 10.7352/IJSP.2017.48.331
Rights: The publisher has not responded to our queries therefore this work cannot be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Licence URL(s): http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Birch et al. (2017).pdfFulltext - Accepted Version643.95 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-11-01    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.