Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/24511
Appears in Collections:Economics Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Downside financial risk is misunderstood
Authors: Newall, Philip W S
Contact Email: p.s.newall@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: financial risk
downside risk
numeracy
percentages
financial literacy
deliberation
Issue Date: Sep-2016
Citation: Newall PWS (2016) Downside financial risk is misunderstood, Judgement and Decision Making, 11 (5), pp. 416-423.
Abstract: The mathematics of downside financial risk can be difficult to understand: For example a 50% loss requires a subsequent 100% gain to break-even. A given percentage loss always requires a greater percentage gain to break-even. Instead, many non-expert investors may assume for example that a 50% gain is sufficient to offset a 50% loss. Over 3,498 participants and five experiments, the widespread illusion that a sequence of equal percentage gains and losses produces a zero overall return was demonstrated. Participants continued to err frequently, even with percentage returns of +/-100%, or when financially incentivized. Financial literacy, numeracy, and deliberation were all shown to independently contribute to accurate performance. These results have implications for promoting the understanding of downside financial risk.
URL: http://journal.sjdm.org/16/16222/jdm16222.pdf
Rights: Copyright: © 2016. The authors license this article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
jdm16222.pdf114.2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.