Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/24360
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYu, Hong-Linen_UK
dc.contributor.authorOlmos Giupponi, Maria Belenen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-05T21:31:51Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-05T21:31:51Z-
dc.date.issued2016en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/24360-
dc.description.abstractIn balancing the public’s right to information and the disputants’ right to privacy, this article highlights the distinctions between rights or entitlements to information under confidentiality and privacy under theUNCITRAL Rules on Transparency 2014, as well as suggesting a cautious approach to be taken to avoid judicialising and politicalising the arbitration process.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSteven and Sonsen_UK
dc.relationYu H & Olmos Giupponi MB (2016) The Pandora Box Effects under the UNCITRAL Transparency Rules. Journal of Business Law, 2016 (5), pp. 347-372.en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectConfidentialityen_UK
dc.subjectInvestor-state arbitrationen_UK
dc.subjectPrivacyen_UK
dc.subjectTransparencyen_UK
dc.subjectUNCITRALen_UK
dc.titleThe Pandora Box Effects under the UNCITRAL Transparency Rulesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate3000-12-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Yu_2016_JBL_Issue_5_Print.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Business Lawen_UK
dc.citation.issn0021-9460en_UK
dc.citation.volume2016en_UK
dc.citation.issue5en_UK
dc.citation.spage347en_UK
dc.citation.epage372en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailh.l.yu@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLawen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLawen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid595945en_UK
dc.date.accepted2015-01-21en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-01-21en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-10-05en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorYu, Hong-Lin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorOlmos Giupponi, Maria Belen|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate3000-12-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameYu_2016_JBL_Issue_5_Print.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0021-9460en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Book Chapters and Sections

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Yu_2016_JBL_Issue_5_Print.pdfFulltext - Published Version378.06 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-12-01    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.