Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/24357
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWatchman, Karenen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-05T22:31:07Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-05T22:31:07Z-
dc.date.issued2016-06en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/24357-
dc.description.abstractAdults with Down syndrome are at increased risk of dementia at a significantly younger age and remain under-represented as participants in dementia-related research. Because little is known about their personal experiences either immediately postdiagnosis or as dementia progresses, there is little opportunity that shared individual experiences can shape future policy and practice. To remedy this omission, the author examined methodological and ethical challenges identified as part of a research study that included people with Down syndrome affected by dementia. It has been contended that traditional qualitative approaches are less effective when participants are affected by changing cognitive functioning and reduced verbal communication. To counteract this contention overt participant observation and an adapted narrative research method were used as part of a three-year longitudinal study to help better understand the lived experiences of three adults with Down syndrome affected by dementia. Methodological and ethical challenges were shown to collide, and factors contributing to this effect included identifying process consent, accurate representation of participants, the role of and relationship with the researcher, participants, lack of awareness of their diagnosis of dementia, and need to recognize the importance of social interaction while maintaining academic rigor. Reflections are proffered on two conceptual and practice issues, with a call for both to be recognized and addressed in terms of future policy and practice. First is a lack of awareness of a sense of “self” or identity, resulting in individuals with Down syndrome and dementia being defined by their situation rather than individual preference or need. Second is the lack of information postdiagnosis about dementia being shared with people who have Down syndrome.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_UK
dc.relationWatchman K (2016) Investigating the Lived Experience of People with Down Syndrome with Dementia: Overcoming Methodological and Ethical Challenges. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 13 (2), pp. 190-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12167en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectDown syndromeen_UK
dc.subjectAgeingen_UK
dc.subjectintellectual disabilitiesen_UK
dc.subjectEthicsen_UK
dc.titleInvestigating the Lived Experience of People with Down Syndrome with Dementia: Overcoming Methodological and Ethical Challengesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-26en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Watchman-2016-Journal_of_Policy_and_Practice_in_Intellectual_Disabilities.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jppi.12167en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilitiesen_UK
dc.citation.issn1741-1130en_UK
dc.citation.issn1741-1122en_UK
dc.citation.volume13en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage190en_UK
dc.citation.epage198en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailkaren.watchman@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date25/06/2016en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Research - Stirling - LEGACYen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000383715200012en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84976527704en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid548241en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0000-3589en_UK
dc.date.accepted2016-02-11en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-02-11en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-10-04en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorWatchman, Karen|0000-0003-0000-3589en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-26en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameWatchman-2016-Journal_of_Policy_and_Practice_in_Intellectual_Disabilities.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1741-1130en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Watchman-2016-Journal_of_Policy_and_Practice_in_Intellectual_Disabilities.pdfFulltext - Published Version169.06 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-26    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.