|Appears in Collections:||History and Politics Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||A critical discussion of complexity theory: how does 'complexity thinking' improve our understanding of politics and policymaking?|
|Citation:||Cairney P & Geyer R (2017) A critical discussion of complexity theory: how does 'complexity thinking' improve our understanding of politics and policymaking?, Complexity, Governance and Networks, 3 (2), pp. 1-11.|
|Abstract:||In this brief article, we present a critical discussion of complexity theory, asking: what does it really offer policy studies? We suggest that its stated advantages - interdisciplinarity, theoretical novelty, and empirical advance - are generally exaggerated and based more on hope than experience. In that context, we identify a cautiously positive role for complexity theory, primarily as a way to bridge academic and policymaker discussions and prompt important discussions of pragmatism in policymaking|
|Rights:||Published in Complexity, Governance & Networks by University of Bamberg Press to be published under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license The original publication will be available at: https://doi.org/10.20377/cgn-56|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.