Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/24101
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCairney, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorFischer, Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorIngold, Karin-
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-29T00:53:17Z-
dc.date.issued2016-11-28-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/24101-
dc.description.abstractWe address a key puzzle in policy studies: why don't major differences in political systems and policy produce major differences in policy processes, outputs, and outcomes? We show why key aspects of fracking policy are similar in the UK and Switzerland despite the UK majoritarian government being ‘all out for shale' and Switzerland's consensus democracy favouring moratoriums. We use the ‘advocacy coalition framework' and new survey data to show why differences in UK and Swiss processes are subtle. In both cases, actors cooperate and compete with each other by sharing information within and across coalitionsen_UK
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherPolicy Press-
dc.relationCairney P, Fischer M & Ingold K (2016) Fracking in the UK and Switzerland: why differences in policymaking systems don’t always produce different outputs and outcomes’ (Forthcoming/Available Online), Policy and Politics.-
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.-
dc.subjectpolicyen_UK
dc.subjectpolicymakingen_UK
dc.subjectfrackingen_UK
dc.subjectUKen_UK
dc.subjectSwitzerlanden_UK
dc.titleFracking in the UK and Switzerland: why differences in policymaking systems don’t always produce different outputs and outcomes’ (Forthcoming/Available Online)en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2018-08-16T00:00:00Z-
dc.rights.embargoreasonUntil this work is formally published there will be an embargo on the full text of this work. Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1332/030557316X14793989976783-
dc.citation.jtitlePolicy and Politics-
dc.citation.issn0305-5736-
dc.citation.publicationstatusIn press-
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereed-
dc.type.statusPost-print (author final draft post-refereeing)-
dc.author.emailp.a.cairney@stir.ac.uk-
dc.citation.date28/11/2016-
dc.contributor.affiliationPolitics-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bern-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bern-
dc.rights.embargoterms2018-08-17-
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2018-08-17-
Appears in Collections:History and Politics Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cairney Fischer Ingold Fracking UK Switzerland Policy and Politics 23.8.16.pdf495.9 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 17/8/2018     Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.

This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.