|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Secondary Science Teachers as Curriculum Makers: Mapping and Designing Scotland's New Curriculum for Excellence (Forthcoming)|
|Citation:||Wallace C & Priestley M (2016) Secondary Science Teachers as Curriculum Makers: Mapping and Designing Scotland's New Curriculum for Excellence (Forthcoming), Journal of Research in Science Teaching.|
|Abstract:||Scotland is one of several countries to have recently implemented a new national curriculum to highlight 21st century educational priorities. Teachers have been mandated to follow the new curriculum guidelines, known as Curriculum for Excellence (CfE), since the fall of 2010. The purpose of this study was to use a phenomenological lens to investigate how Scottish secondary science teachers are experiencing their work of curriculum development, including daily lesson design and more broadly, curriculum mapping within the context of reform (Remillard, 1999). We probed seven science teachers’ experiences to create both a composite profile of conscious thoughts about curriculum design and individual profiles that highlight interactions between the curriculum mandates, beliefs and agentic orientations. The study indicated that changes to curriculum development required accepting new cognitive commitments including: (a) analyzing the CfE document to discern the most significant principles underlying change; (b) reflecting on the ways that science teacher curriculum development is a problem-solving endeavor; (c) undertaking the complex processes of curriculum mapping, from primary school all the way through national qualification exams; and (d) recognizing that the epistemological frame for students’ science learning has changed and providing opportunities for students to create and apply knowledge. Two significant findings include the unpacking of these cognitive activities as part of a transformation toward a new epistemology of pedagogy, and the assertion that official curriculum documents can promote change, albeit with caveats concerning individual beliefs, agentic orientations and possibilities for agency within school contexts.|
|Rights:||This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|Affiliation:||Kennesaw State University|
Education Management and Support
|Secondary Science Teachers as Curriculum Makers_final.pdf||613.2 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 30/7/2019 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependant on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.