|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||RE: pedagogy – after neutrality|
pedagogy of difference
|Citation:||I'Anson J (2010) RE: pedagogy – after neutrality, British Journal of Religious Education, 32 (2), pp. 105-118.|
|Abstract:||Within the UK and in many parts of the world, official accounts of what it is to make sense of religion are framed within a rhetorics of neutrality in which such study is premised upon the possibility of dispassionate engagement and analysis. This paper, which is largely theoretical in scope, explores both the affordances and the costs of such an approach which has become ‘black boxed’ on account of the work that it achieves. A series of new orientations within the academy that are broadly associated with post-structuralist philosophies, feminist and post-colonial studies, together with insights from Science and Technology Studies, question the plausibility of these claims for neutrality whilst in turn raising a series of new questions and priorities. It therefore becomes necessary to re-think and re-frame what it is to make sense of religious and cultural difference after neutrality. The gathering and co-ordination of new planes of sense-making that are responsive to an emergent series of epistemological, ontological, and ethical orientations are considered. Some of the distinctive pedagogical implications of such an approach that engages material practice, difference and uncertainty are then entertained.|
|Rights:||Published in the British Journal of Religious Education by Taylor & Francis (Routledge).; This is an electronic version of an article published in the British Journal of Religious Education, Volume 32, Issue 2, March 2010, pp. 105 - 118. The British Journal of Religious Education is available online at: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&issn=0141-6200&volume=32&issue=2&spage=105|
|IAnson BJRE paper revised-1 (2).pdf||482.71 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.