Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23870
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchinkel, Meghanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorChambers, Christine Ten_UK
dc.contributor.authorCaes, Lineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMoon, Erin Cen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-21T00:07:43Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-21T00:07:43Z-
dc.date.issued2017-01en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/23870-
dc.description.abstractParental behavior plays a significant role in children's pain response. Prior research has found generally no differences between mothers’ and fathers’ verbal behavior during child pain. This study compared mothers’ and fathers’ nonverbal behavior during child pain. Nonverbal behavior of mothers (n= 39) and fathers (n= 39) of 39 children (20 boys) aged 8 to 12 years who participated in the cold pressor task (counterbalanced once with each parent) was coded. A range of nonverbal behaviors were coded, including distraction, physical proximity, physical comfort/reassurance, procedure-related attending behavior, and fidgeting. The most common behaviors parents engaged in were fidgeting, procedure-related attending behaviors, and physical proximity. Results indicated that the types of nonverbal behavior parents engage in did not differ between mothers and fathers. However, children of mothers who engaged in more physical comfort/reassurance reported higher levels of pain intensity, and children of mothers who engaged in more procedure-related attending behaviors had lower pain tolerance. Further, both mothers and fathers who engaged in higher levels of verbal nonattending behaviors also engaged in lower levels of nonverbal procedure-related attending behaviors. These findings further support the importance of considering the influence of mothers and fathers in children's pain, and provide novel insights into the role of nonverbal behavior.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell for World Institute of Painen_UK
dc.relationSchinkel M, Chambers CT, Caes L & Moon EC (2017) A Comparison of Maternal versus Paternal Nonverbal Behavior During Child Pain. Pain Practice, 17 (1), pp. 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12415en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Schinkel, M. G., Chambers, C. T., Caes, L. and Moon, E. C. (2017), A Comparison of Maternal versus Paternal Nonverbal Behavior During Child Pain. Pain Pract, 17: 41–51, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12415. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.en_UK
dc.subjectchilden_UK
dc.subjectpainen_UK
dc.subjectnonverbal behavioren_UK
dc.subjectmothersen_UK
dc.subjectfathersen_UK
dc.subjectparental behavioren_UK
dc.titleA Comparison of Maternal versus Paternal Nonverbal Behavior During Child Painen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2017-02-21en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Schinkel Chambers et al. 2016 (1).pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/papr.12415en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid26895789en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePain Practiceen_UK
dc.citation.issn1533-2500en_UK
dc.citation.issn1530-7085en_UK
dc.citation.volume17en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage41en_UK
dc.citation.epage51en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailline.caes@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date20/02/2016en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationDalhousie Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationDalhousie Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBritish Columbia Children's Hospitalen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000394430600005en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84975701606en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid556756en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7355-0706en_UK
dc.date.accepted2015-09-17en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-09-17en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-07-13en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorSchinkel, Meghan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorChambers, Christine T|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCaes, Line|0000-0001-7355-0706en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMoon, Erin C|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2017-02-21en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2017-02-20en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2017-02-21|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameSchinkel Chambers et al. 2016 (1).pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1530-7085en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Schinkel Chambers et al. 2016 (1).pdfFulltext - Accepted Version361.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.