|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Book Chapters and Sections|
|Title:||"How did the serpent of inconsistency enter Frege's paradise?" (Forthcoming)|
|Citation:||Wright C (2017) "How did the serpent of inconsistency enter Frege's paradise?" (Forthcoming). In: Ebert P, Rossberg M (ed.). Essays on Frege's Basic Laws of Arithmetic, Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.|
|Abstract:||My project here is the appraisal of Michael Dummett's diagnosis that the inconsistency of Frege’s system in Grundgesetze is attributable to his neglect of the indefinite extensibility of fundamental mathematical concepts. I address a problem that obscures the usual intuitive characterisations of the notion of indefinite extensibility, and offer thereby what I believe to be the correct characterisation of the notion. En passant, some issues are reviewed about the "size" of indefinitely extensible concepts. And that will bring us into position to scrutinise the connections of the notion as characterised with paradox, and specifically the paradox that Russell found for Frege’s Basic Law V. It will be argued that Dummett’s diagnosis is apt for the Burali-Forti paradox, wrong for Cantor’s paradox, and correct for the paradox inherent in Law V only on the assumption that full classical imperative higher-order logic is indeed wholly logical.|
|Rights:||This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|Gg Companion FINAL version-2.pdf||396.03 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 1/1/2020 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.