Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/2377
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcCreaddie, Mayen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPayne, Sheilaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFroggatt, Katherineen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-12T00:45:59Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-12T00:45:59Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2010-09en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/2377-
dc.description.abstractBackground The concept of ‘positive thinking’ emerged in cancer care in the 1990s. The usefulness of this approach in cancer care is under increasing scrutiny with existing research, definitions and approaches debated. Nurses may wish to judiciously examine the debate in context and consider its relevance in relation to their experience and clinical practice. Purpose To offer a constructivist perspective on ‘being positive’ we extract data from a constructivist grounded theory study on humour in healthcare interactions in order to identify implications for practice and future research. Methods We present three areas for consideration. First, we review the emergence of this concept in the broader context of health care generally and cancer care specifically. Second, we present data from a grounded theory study on humour in healthcare interactions to highlight the prevalence of this aspect of cancer care and its contested domains. We conclude with implications for practice and research. Findings Patients actively seek meaningful and therapeutic interactions with healthcare staff and ‘being positive’ may be part of that process. Being positive has multiple meanings at different time-points for different people at different stages of their cancer journey. Patients may become ensnared by positivity through its uncritical acceptance and enactment. Conclusion Positive thinking does not exist in isolation but as part of a complex, dynamic, multi-faceted patient persona enacted to varying degrees in situated healthcare interactions. Nurses need to be aware of the potential multiplicity of meanings in interactions and be able (and willing) to respond appropriately.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationMcCreaddie M, Payne S & Froggatt K (2010) Ensnared by positivity: a constructivist perspective on 'being positive' in cancer care. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 14 (4), pp. 283-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2010.03.002en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author; you can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectPositiveen_UK
dc.subjectConstructivisten_UK
dc.subjectGrounded Theoryen_UK
dc.subjectinteractionsen_UK
dc.subjectSelf-realizationen_UK
dc.subjectExpectation (Psychology)en_UK
dc.subjectNursing diagnosis Case studiesen_UK
dc.titleEnsnared by positivity: a constructivist perspective on 'being positive' in cancer careen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[McCreaddie Payne and Froggatt 2010.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejon.2010.03.002en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEuropean Journal of Oncology Nursingen_UK
dc.citation.issn1462-3889en_UK
dc.citation.volume14en_UK
dc.citation.issue4en_UK
dc.citation.spage283en_UK
dc.citation.epage290en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailmay.mccreaddie@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Research - Stirling - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Stirlingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Stirlingen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000282146600005en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-77955657555en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid816388en_UK
dc.date.accepted1990-01-01en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted1990-01-01en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2010-07-19en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcCreaddie, May|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPayne, Sheila|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFroggatt, Katherine|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-31en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameMcCreaddie Payne and Froggatt 2010.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1462-3889en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
McCreaddie Payne and Froggatt 2010.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.03 MBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.