Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23774
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHale, Boben_UK
dc.contributor.authorWright, Crispinen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-14T23:58:32Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-14T23:58:32Z-
dc.date.issued2015en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/23774-
dc.description.abstractWe begin by drawing attention to some drawbacks of what we shall call the Frege-Quine definition of analytic truth. With this we contrast the definition of analytic propositions given by Bolzano in his Wissenschaftslehre.If Bolzano’s definition is viewed, as Bolzano himself almost certainly did not view it, as attempting to capture the notion of analyticity as truth-in-virtue-of-meaning which occupied centre stage during the first half of the last century and which, Quine’s influential assault on it notwithstanding,continues to attract philosophical attention, it runs into some very serious problems. We argue that Bolzano’s central idea can, nevertheless,be used as the basis of a new definition which avoids these problems and possesses definite advantages over the Frege-Quine approach.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBrill Rodopien_UK
dc.relationHale B & Wright C (2015) Bolzano's Definition of Analytic Propositions. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 91 (1), pp. 325-364. http://www.brill.com/products/book/themes-ontology-mind-and-logic#TOC_1en_UK
dc.rightsPublisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Grazer Philosophische Studien. 2015, Vol. 91 Issue 1, p325-364 by Brill/Rodopi. The original publication is available at: http://www.brill.com/products/book/themes-ontology-mind-and-logic#TOC_1en_UK
dc.subjectQuineen_UK
dc.subjectBolzanoen_UK
dc.subjectAnalyticityen_UK
dc.subjectTruth-in-Virtue-of-Meaningen_UK
dc.subjectA Priorien_UK
dc.titleBolzano's Definition of Analytic Propositionsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleGrazer Philosophische Studien - Internationale Zeitschrift für Analytische Philosophieen_UK
dc.citation.issn0165-9227en_UK
dc.citation.volume91en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage325en_UK
dc.citation.epage364en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.brill.com/products/book/themes-ontology-mind-and-logic#TOC_1en_UK
dc.author.emailcjw5@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Sheffielden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPhilosophyen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid556903en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-12-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-07-13en_UK
dc.subject.tagPhilosophy of Logic and Language, including History of Analytic Philosophyen_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorHale, Bob|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWright, Crispin|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2016-07-14en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2016-07-14|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamebolzano_final.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0165-9227en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
bolzano_final.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version520.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.