|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Enacting educational partnership: collective identity, decision-making (and the importance of muffin chat) (Forthcoming/Available Online)|
|Keywords:||communicative constitution of organizations (CCO)|
interorganizational collaboration (IOC)
laughter in meetings
|Publisher:||Taylor and Francis|
|Citation:||Watson C & Drew V Enacting educational partnership: collective identity, decision-making (and the importance of muffin chat) (Forthcoming/Available Online), School Leadership and Management.|
|Abstract:||The rhetoric of partnership is ubiquitous in the current policy context. In education, partnerships take a number of forms among which is ‘interorganizational collaboration’ (IOC), defined as a partnership between institutions/organizations aimed at developing synergistic solutions to complex problems. But policy has a tendency to veneer, obscuring its enactment. The purpose of this paper is therefore to examine what such partnerships look like on the ground. Here we present an empirical analysis which aims to produce knowledge about the working of such collaborative groups and to provide insights into leadership within such partnerships. Drawing on communicative constitution of organizations (CCO) operationalised within a schema for understanding the emergence of collective identity in IOC, we undertake an analysis of meetings held by a working group comprising academics and local authority staff set up to develop masters level work-based professional learning for teachers. We ask, how do professionals working within different contexts create a collective identity that supports decision making, and what are the implications for leadership?|
|Rights:||This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in School Leadership & Management on 18 Jul 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13632434.2016.1209181|
|NotforReviewFinalrevisedSLMPartnership.pdf||189.62 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 18/1/2018 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependant on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.