Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23292
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGrant, Aileenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorTreweek, Shaunen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDreischulte, Tobiasen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFoy, Robbieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGuthrie, Bruceen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-06T23:52:11Z-
dc.date.available2016-06-06T23:52:11Z-
dc.date.issued2013-01-12en_UK
dc.identifier.other15en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/23292-
dc.description.abstractBackground  Process evaluations are recommended to open the ‘black box’ of complex interventions evaluated in trials, but there is limited guidance to help researchers design process evaluations. Much current literature on process evaluations of complex interventions focuses on qualitative methods, with less attention paid to quantitative methods. This discrepancy led us to develop our own framework for designing process evaluations of cluster-randomised controlled trials.  Methods  We reviewed recent theoretical and methodological literature and selected published process evaluations; these publications identified a need for structure to help design process evaluations. We drew upon this literature to develop a framework through iterative exchanges, and tested this against published evaluations.  Results  The developed framework presents a range of candidate approaches to understanding trial delivery, intervention implementation and the responses of targeted participants. We believe this framework will be useful to others designing process evaluations of complex intervention trials. We also propose key information that process evaluations could report to facilitate their identification and enhance their usefulness.  Conclusion  There is no single best way to design and carry out a process evaluation. Researchers will be faced with choices about what questions to focus on and which methods to use. The most appropriate design depends on the purpose of the process evaluation; the framework aims to help researchers make explicit their choices of research questions and methods.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_UK
dc.relationGrant A, Treweek S, Dreischulte T, Foy R & Guthrie B (2013) Process evaluations for cluster randomised trials of complex interventions: a proposed framework for design and reporting. Trials, 14, Art. No.: 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-15en_UK
dc.rights© Grant et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectProcess evaluationen_UK
dc.subjectComplex interventionen_UK
dc.subjectCluster-randomised controlled trialen_UK
dc.subjectQualitativeen_UK
dc.subjectQuantitativeen_UK
dc.subjectReportingen_UK
dc.titleProcess evaluations for cluster randomised trials of complex interventions: a proposed framework for design and reportingen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1745-6215-14-15en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid23311722en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleTrialsen_UK
dc.citation.issn1745-6215en_UK
dc.citation.volume14en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailaileen.grant@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date12/01/2013en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Research - Stirling - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Taysideen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Leedsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000317079000001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84872135442en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid570989en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6146-101Xen_UK
dc.date.accepted2012-12-18en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2012-12-18en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-06-06en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorGrant, Aileen|0000-0001-6146-101Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorTreweek, Shaun|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDreischulte, Tobias|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFoy, Robbie|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGuthrie, Bruce|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2016-06-06en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2016-06-06|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameGrant-et-al-Trials-2013.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Grant-et-al-Trials-2013.pdfFulltext - Published Version848.34 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.