|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||What remains of History? Historical epistemology and historical understanding in Scotland’s Curriculum for Excellence (Forthcoming/Available Online)|
Curriculum for Excellence
|Publisher:||Taylor and Francis|
|Citation:||Smith J (2016) What remains of History? Historical epistemology and historical understanding in Scotland’s Curriculum for Excellence (Forthcoming/Available Online) , Curriculum Journal.|
|Abstract:||This paper critically examines the framing of historical knowledge in the primary and 'broad general education' phases (ages 4-14) of Scotland's Curriculum for Excellence. The paper focuses on curriculum documentation, particularly the curriculum’s aims and ‘Experiences and Outcomes and evaluates these in light of recent research on children’s historical understanding. It is argued that the decision to frame historical understanding as 'People, Past Events and Societies' within the context of a 'social studies' curriculum area has been motivated by a misunderstanding of history's unique disciplinary identity. It is argued that history curricula must take account of the unique ontological and epistemological challenges posed by investigating the past and that by failing to do this, ‘Curriculum for Excellence’ offers children in Scotland a problematic representation of what it means to study the past. The paper challenges the curriculum in both epistemic and pedagogical terms, before suggesting that a rigorous study of history as a discipline can make a valuable contribution to children’s personal and social development.|
|Rights:||This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Curriculum Journal on 05 Jul 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09585176.2016.1197138|
|CfE History Critique.pdf||473.07 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 5/1/2018 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependant on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.