|Appears in Collections:||History and Politics Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||The European Council and the Legitimacy Paradox of New Intergovernmentalism: Constitutional Agency Meets Politicisation|
|Publisher:||Taylor and Francis|
|Citation:||Glencross A (2016) The European Council and the Legitimacy Paradox of New Intergovernmentalism: Constitutional Agency Meets Politicisation, Journal of European Integration, 38 (5), pp. 497-509.|
|Abstract:||This paper examines the actions of the European Council during the Eurozone crisis through the lens of political constitutionalism. This analysis examines the role of political inputs in shaping EU constitutional developments, whether supranational or intergovernmental, to demonstrate the “legitimacy paradox” of new intergovernmentalism. That is, the European Council claimed the electoral legitimacy to rescue the Euro, but in doing so opened up new avenues for contesting EU legitimacy, notably in relation to national budgetary decision-making. For unlike with supranational constitutional agency, the European Council has the means to politicize its actions. However, the strategy taken during the sovereign debt crisis is shown to be one of depoliticization to prevent domestic contestation of EMU reform. At the same time, paradoxically, the politics of macro-economic policy has become Europeanized with the active participation of EU supranational actors. Since EMU reform is dependent on supranational enforcement of EMU rules, the new intergovernmentalism faces political contestation that previous, supranational EU constitutional development did not.|
|Rights:||This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Journal of European Integration on 19/07/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/07036337.2016.1178250|
|Glencross_JEI_Accepted_April_2016.pdf||470.46 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 19/1/2018 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependant on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.